The-Armys-87-million-deal-with-Anduril-is-about-linking.jpeg

The Army’s $87 million deal with Anduril is about linking sensors and shooters to give operators a better shot at defeating drones

The US Army’s sweeping new deal with Anduril includes an $87 million effort to link counter-drone systems so troops can better spot, track, and destroy enemy drones — a threat growing on and off the battlefield.

The Army-led Joint Interagency Task Force 401 selected Anduril’s Lattice software for its new command and control system. JIATF-401, established last summer, has been working to write the rules for countering drones in partnership with the FBI and Department of Homeland Security. Sharing approved systems, particularly a common software that everyone can use, has been a priority for the task force.

The task force announced the decision last Friday, saying that a common backbone for its drone defenses was necessary as uncrewed aerial systems become an increasing threat.

Anduril’s Lattice is expected to allow personnel from across the military and federal agents to share and see each other’s data, have a clearer picture of what threats exist, and better coordinate responses to drone attacks, the service said in its press statement.

On Monday, Anduril said the task force’s command and control system with Lattice will involve numerous sensors for detecting drones and interceptors for stopping them.

Legacy weapon systems and new assets will be able to connect to the platform, “enabling distributed detection, tracking, classification, and ultimately engagement of UAS threats,” Park Hughes, Anduril’s managing director for air defense, said.


A small drone sits on a rock. A soldier wearing camouflage crouches next to the rock.

JIATF-401 was stood up last August to rapidly deploy counter-drone systems and common operating procedures across the military and government agencies. 

US Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Donovan E. Melendez



Lattice is also part of the Army’s new Next Generation Command and Control system, which the service has been testing since last year. NGC2 is being built with a Silicon Valley-style “move fast, fail fast, fix fast” approach, which the Army and other services have said is necessary to field new systems quickly.

The task force’s $87 million agreement falls under a much larger contract the Army also announced Friday. That agreement, worth up to $20 billion over the next decade, allows any federal agency to purchase Anduril’s off-the-shelf systems, the company’s chief business officer, Matthew Steckman, told reporters.

“The modern battlefield is increasingly defined by software,” Gabe Chiulli, chief technology officer for the Department of Defense’s Office of the Chief Information Officer, said in a release. “To maintain our advantage, we must be able to acquire and deploy software capabilities with speed and efficiency.”

Steckman said that while the contract isn’t the first of its kind, it was more complex because Anduril makes a wide variety of products, from software to drones and wearable artificial intelligence goggles, that the government can buy. The Army alone has 120 existing contracts with Anduril already, and the new deal is intended to help streamline how the company and the government do business.

“By establishing both the common C2 [command and control] software platform and the common process for the government to procure, deploy, and sustain ever-improving counter-UAS software at scale, the JIATF is very much accelerating the nation’s response to the UAS threat,” Hughes said.

The Army and other military services are shifting their approach, aiming to reduce what leaders see as bureaucratic hurdles in how weapons are tested, funded, and procured. That shift includes buying commercially available systems, such as software, drones, and counter-drone technology, from vendors like Anduril.

Officials have said the changing approach is designed to cut costs, speed up the acquisition process, and rapidly procure the weapons that troops need sooner rather than later.




Source link

Headshot of Chris Panella.

The Army’s new drone competition is really a talent hunt. It’s scouting out what makes a top drone pilot.

The US Army used its first Best Drone Warfighter competition not just to test skills, officials say, but to identify what makes a top drone operator — and who in the force is best suited for the job.

Rather than training every soldier to fly drones, the Army is using competition to identify the skill sets of top drone operators and whether there are specific roles within units that would make the most sense for working with uncrewed aerial systems.

The effort reflects a broader shift from treating drone flying as something for all soldiers to approaching it as a specialized skill set that requires the right aptitude, training, and sustained practice.

The inaugural drone competition took place this week at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, gathering teams from across active, Reserve, and National Guard units. There were no requirements on what types of soldiers could participate or where they came from.

Rather, “it was just send your best UAS operators,” Col. Nicholas Ryan, director of Army UAS Transformation at the Aviation Center of Excellence, told reporters, prompting a mix of operators with different backgrounds and expertise.

Over three days, soldiers competed in multiple events, testing their piloting skills. The first was an obstacle course that operators navigated using first-person-view drones.


A soldier holds a drone controller.

Recent US Department of Defense directives have prioritized the development and integration of drones across the Army.

US Army photo by Spc. Michelle Lessard-Terry



The second was a hunter-killer scenario in which teams used a reconnaissance drone to survey an array of targets and decide which were highest priority for simulated strikes with one-way attack drones. The competition didn’t involve any kinetic strikes; instead, soldiers flew the drones into nets on the targets.

The third event was focused on innovation. Soldiers could build, modify, and test their own drones.

Ryan said that the Army was taking notes throughout the competition on who the top operators were, calling it talent management.

“At the end of the day,” he said, “it’s not about receiving trophies or awards,” it is about identifying what sets the top drone operators apart and figuring out how they developed those skills. The goal, he said, is to understand “what lessons can we take from this to find out who the best operator is and how they became the best operator. What skills and resources and training allowed them to become the best operator?”

Soldiers in the US and Ukraine have noticed that gamers make excellent drone pilots, as do soldiers who have experience piloting hobby drones.

“That’s something we’re absolutely looking at right now,” Ryan said.

Army leaders have previously noted a correlation between soldiers who grew up playing video games — or who are active gamers — and drone proficiency.

Troops who game have shown quick reflexes, precise hand-eye coordination, and strong spatial awareness that make them competent with drones.

At an exercise in Germany last fall, a US Army captain told Business Insider that the top pilots were soldiers who “when they got off on Fridays, then go and play video games.”

The Army has been restructuring its approach to drone warfare, rewriting its training and focusing on integrating soldiers with small drone training into front-line units. Lessons and approaches are being shared across the service, building a broader doctrine on how the Army is adopting drones.


A quadcopter drone flies on a field with trees in the background.

The competition allowed Army leadership to learn more about the skillsets and backgrounds that make drone operators successful.

US Army photo by Sgt. Aaron Troutman



Ryan said that the service is realizing that flying drones needs to be a dedicated assignment. “You can’t be a squad rifleman and a drone operator,” he said, explaining that “it’s one or the other because you have to have the level of skill and expertise in operating and employing the drones. That’s what you have to be good at and train at and focus on for most of your time.”

Other Army officials said efforts like the competition were demonstrating where drones best fit in a formation and what aspects of training are most important to maintain these highly perishable skills.

For the most part, soldiers flew their drones successfully, but the Army did take note of communication breakdowns as soldiers went through the hunter-killer lane, specifically getting drones into position and identifying and simulating strikes on targets.

“That’s an example of something we didn’t anticipate, but it’s absolutely standing out as that is something we as an Army need to do better on,” Ryan said. “If we’re going to proliferate these drones and want them to be more effective and lethal, we just need to improve on how our soldiers talk to each other to communicate when they’re using them.”

In future iterations of the Best Drone Warfighter competition, the Army hopes to include kinetic elements as well as electronic warfare and jamming to better replicate real-world scenarios.




Source link