Headshot of Jordan Pandy

As a real estate agent, making money off Airbnbs was a safe bet. I decided to franchise my favorite coffee shop instead.

This as-told-to essay is based on a conversation with Jordan Hooten, 34, a Florida real estate agent who franchised a coffee shop in St. Petersburg, Florida, to diversify his income. The following has been edited for length and clarity.

Real estate has been good to me. I got my real estate license about 11 years ago, when I was 23, but I’ve been practicing full-time for seven years.

Single-family residential has always been my bread and butter; helping people find their first house, helping somebody sell their first house, and helping them find their second house.

Over the last four years, I’ve started doing a lot of multifamily and commercial properties as well.

I’ve seen a couple of different cycles of the market — my parents were flipping houses back in the early 2000s, so I’ve been following real estate since I was a teenager.

When I first came in around 2018, it was a stable market, not too dissimilar to the market that we’re in right now, but inventory would sit for a little while.

Then and now, we went through the 2.5% interest rate market, which was a lot of fun. Back then, if you signed a listing agreement, you could already count the money. You could pretty much say, “I’m getting that money in the next 45 days.”


A garage door opening into a coffee shop.

Southern Grounds’ St. Petersburg, Florida, location. 

Southern Grounds



Now, it’s like you can have eight listings worth of a total of $5 million in volume and say, “I really don’t know how this is going to go. I think I’ll get most of this, but it’s not as much of a sure thing.”

The drastic change was very tough on a lot of people in my industry when it went from the 2022 rates to the 2023 rates overnight.

I used to work out of this coffee shop, so I decided to invest in it myself

When the market was going well, previously I’d diversify by buying Airbnbs.

I’ve had a part in four Airbnbs at one time or another. Sometimes you sell them because it’s just a good time, but that business, it’s like you put up $70,000 in your savings, and you’re happy to be getting a return of maybe $800 a month.

Every now and then, there’s a problem where you have to come up with $2,000 to $5,000 out of pocket. I thought this was a pretty good idea for investment if you’re 55 years old — just keep stacking these and say, “All right, well that one will pay for my health insurance, and that one will pay for my car insurance, and that’s great.”

But I was like, I’m 30 years old, why don’t I take a stab at investing in something that could make me the same amount as real estate does? And once it’s stabilized, it will not take up all my time?

I could invest $70,000 and make $800 a month, but what if I could invest double that and potentially make $12,000 or $13,000 a month?

It’s a good time in life for me to take that chance.


A colorful mural inside a coffee shop.

Hooten was able to make the investment due to his success as an agent. 

Southern Grounds



I was doing so well in real estate that I was confident enough to invest over six figures in a coffee business. But it wasn’t just coffee; it was specifically Southern Grounds.

When I didn’t have an office, I used to go up to Southern Grounds in Jacksonville all the time. It was a place where I could sit on my laptop and order coffee, and didn’t feel pressured to order food until I was ready to order food. If I wanted to stay and work on my laptop and make phone calls for four hours, I could.

I reached out to the founder on Facebook and said, “Man, I want to franchise your store. It’s my favorite place in the world to go,” and that’s how all this started.

I started this process in 2022. We’ve been working on building this store for three and a half years from when we signed the Franchise Disclosure Document to when we actually opened our store in August 2025.

There’s no way we could have afforded to buy our building — it actually wouldn’t even pencil if you look at it as a real estate deal. Our rent of $13,500 is probably half of what the mortgage would be if we bought it. Downtown St. Petersburg is very overpriced.


Downtown St. Petersburg, Florida.

St. Petersburg, Florida. 

RudyBalasko/Getty Images



I had to build the entire restaurant from looking like a garage into a restaurant. The construction alone was about $800,000. That’s just to build out the interior of the building that we are renting — I mean, silverware for a restaurant is $25,000.

I think that in the real estate industry, your first year is not usually a good indicator of how you’re going to do financially, just like the restaurant business. During my first year in real estate, I didn’t do that well. So I would say I’m happier with the year one restaurant success than year one real estate success, for sure.

I’m glad I took a risk and diversified my income

I bartended in college, so I’ve always been on the hospitality side of business, and I guess you could say real estate is hospitality: It’s being a people person, enjoying talking to people, enjoying hearing their stories and where different people are from and what they’re doing and what they’ve got going on the rest of the weekend — just caring.

My transaction volume is still the same since before I bought the coffee shop. My real estate business has taken a slight hit because it hasn’t continued to grow in the way that I think it may have grown had I not taken on any other endeavors. But ultimately, I’m not losing clients.

Buying the coffee shop really has not changed my day-to-day; it has just required more time management and multitasking. I wake up earlier and work later. I’m working my ass off.

I think it’s a good idea for real estate agents to diversify their income. It really just depends on each person’s financial situation.

Sometimes I wonder, “Did I make the right decision?”

I think I did because I enjoy this.




Source link

Kevin-OLeary-loves-his-Marty-Supreme-costar-Timothee-Chalamet-so.jpeg

Kevin O’Leary loves his ‘Marty Supreme’ costar Timothée Chalamet so much, he bet $1,000 on Kalshi that he’ll win an Oscar

  • Kevin O’Leary is betting big on Timothée Chalamet.
  • O’Leary said on the red carpet that he bet $1,000 that his “Marty Supreme” costar will win an Oscar.
  • Chalamet is up against Michael B. Jordan for best actor.

Kevin O’Leary is confident his “Marty Supreme” costar Timothée Chalamet is walking away with the best actor Oscar.

The “Shark Tank” star is so confident, in fact, he put money on it.

O’Leary, who plays tycoon Milton Rockwell in “Marty Supreme,” told Variety on the Oscars red carpet that he bet $1,000 on the betting app Kalshi that Chalamet will win the prize.

“I know the voting stopped long before that controversy happened,” O’Leary told the magazine, referring to a comment Chalamet made during a conversation with Matthew McConaughey earlier this month where he talked down the ballet and opera.

“I don’t want to be working in ballet or opera where it’s like, ‘Hey, keep this thing alive, even though no one cares about this anymore,'” Chalamet said.

Chalamet has been the frontrunner for the best actor Oscar until recently, when “Sinners” star Michael B. Jordon won the best actor prize at SAG’s Actor Awards. And O’Leary is right — Oscar voting did indeed close before Chalamet’s mini-controversy. So whether Mr. Wonderful wins or loses $1,000, it won’t be related to a love or hatred for opera and ballet.




Source link

Lloyd Lee

Lucid Motors: 5 big announcements on autonomy, robotaxi bet

Lucid Motors is making a big swing toward autonomy, pursuing self-driving in personal cars and a two-seater robotaxi that would rival Tesla’s Cybercab.

During the company’s investor day in New York City on Thursday, interim CEO Marc Winterhoff said Lucid Motors’ investment in robotaxis and autonomy will play a key role in bringing the company to profitability.

“L4 is our north star — to get there as fast as possible,” he said, “and in the end, be a profitable company and cash-flow positive.”

Lucid Motors executives laid out the road map for its robotaxi, which includes a “business-to-business” strategy partnering with companies like Uber, and a timeline for deploying self-driving technology for consumer vehicles by 2029.

With its current portfolio of luxury EV sedans and newly announced investments in midsize SUVs and autonomous driving, Lucid said in its presentation that it expects to target a market that will grow to more than $700 billion by 2035.

Here are the five biggest announcements the EV maker made on autonomy.

Uber partnership deepens

Lucid’s robotaxi partnership with Uber may go beyond the Gravity SUVs that the ride-hailing company has agreed to use for its self-driving fleet.

Lucid said it’s entering the midsize EV market, directly competing with the Tesla Model Y, with two new cars called Lucid Cosmos and Lucid Earth. Starting prices for the EVs will be under $50,000, the company said.

With those midsize SUVs, Lucid said it’s in “advanced discussions” with Uber to scale the ride-hailing company’s robotaxi vehicle platform.

Lucid announced last year that it committed 20,000 Gravity units for Uber’s robotaxis, while the ride-hailing giant has invested $300 million into the EV maker.

Lucid robotaxis set for 2026 launch

The company reaffirmed on Thursday that the commercial launch of Uber’s robotaxi service, through a partnership with Nuro and Lucid, is “on track” for late 2026.

Lucid’s VP of autonomy and advanced driver assistance systems, Kai Stepper, said on Thursday that Uber has been given 80 Gravity SUVs within the past half year for data collection and testing in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Lucid will take on Tesla’s Cybercab

Lucid unveiled a concept for its two-seater robotaxi called “Lunar.”

The car is purpose-built, much like Tesla’s Cybercab or Zoox’s robotaxi, which means the vehicle has no pedals or steering wheel. The concept car that was shown during the presentation included a large console screen that stretched across the dashboard.

Winterhoff said the Lunar will be based on the same platform as the new midsize EVs, allowing for quick ramp-up of production.

The executive said the company expects operating costs to be 40% lower than the robotaxis in the current market; although he did not specify an operator.

Lucid did not explicitly say whether Lunar would be deployed through its partnership with Uber, but Winterhoff revealed the concept car during his conversation with Andrew Macdonald, Uber’s chief operating officer.

“First of all, I feel like I’m sitting in a personal theater with a comfy chair and lots of leg room and the media center in front of me,” Macdonald said. “Second of all, I think our customers are going to love it.”

‘Full Self-Driving’ tech comes to Lucid

Lucid is also betting on self-driving in personally owned cars, outlining a timeline for fully autonomous driving, or Level 4 autonomy, during its investor day.

The company said it expects to deploy hands-free highway driving in the second quarter of 2026; hands-free highway and city driving by 2027; Level 3 autonomy, which allows for eyes-off driving, in 2028; and Level 4 autonomy, or the autonomous driving seen in Waymo’s robotaxi, in 2029.

Winterhoff said during the presentation that the software will be comparable to FSD, or Tesla’s Full Self-Driving, “or better.”

The company did not indicate whether this will enable Lucid to pursue its own robotaxi service. Stepper said Lucid is pursuing a business-to-business strategy for autonomous ride-hailing programs.

Subscription will be a key revenue driver

Lucid is joining a slew of automakers hoping to increase revenue through subscriptions to its self-driving technology.

The company revealed a tiered subscription service for its ADAS, called DreamDrive Pro, that ranges from $69 per month to $199 a month.

The specific features for each tier were not detailed, but the service will range from Level 2+ driving to Level 4 driving.

“Autonomy subscriptions are the single biggest software monetization opportunity,” the company said in its slide deck.




Source link

Polymarket-takes-down-nuclear-detonation-bet-after-online-backlash.jpeg

Polymarket takes down nuclear detonation bet after online backlash

  • Polymarket was allowing traders to wager on whether a nuclear weapon would detonate this year.
  • That stirred backlash online, particularly after suspicious trading in the wake of the Iran strikes.
  • The market has now been taken down.

If you were looking to make money on nuclear detonations, you now have one less avenue to pursue.

Overnight, Polymarket took down a market that allowed users to trade on where a nuclear weapon would detonate by March 31, June 30, or simply before 2027.

Traders who bet yes on any of those timelines would be paid out if there were a nuclear detonation anywhere on Earth, including in an offensive use, a test, or even an accidental detonation.

The market had over $650,000 in total trading volume as of Tuesday, according to an archived snapshot of the site. A message on the webpage now reads: “This event has been archived.”

It’s not yet clear why Polymarket took down the site, or whether users who put money into the market will get refunds. An earlier version of the market, which covered 2025, resolved without incident last year.

A spokesperson for Polymarket did not respond to a request for comment.

The suspension came after several users on X expressed outrage about the existence of the market, particularly amid a raft of suspicious trades on the platform in the wake of the killing of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

This isn’t the first time Polymarket has come under public scrutiny for hosting markets related to armed conflict.

After an anonymous Polymarket trader made over $400,000 on a suspiciously well-timed bet on Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro’s political future, a lawmaker introduced a bill to ban prediction market insider trading by government officials.




Source link

Lucia Moses

Peacock’s next growth bet: selling subscriptions for other streamers

Peacock’s next growth bet isn’t a blockbuster show or sports deal.

NBCU’s flagship streaming service is plotting to sell add-on subscriptions to other specialty streamers on its platform, four people familiar with the plans told Business Insider.

Peacock has approached streamers about selling subscriptions to offer viewers content that complements its reality and sports-heavy line-up, these people said. Peacock expects to start with one streamer this year and is likely to limit the offering to a small number of partners.

Starz, which already has multiple distribution partnerships, is one that’s being considered, two insiders said. Starz declined to comment.

Two people briefed on Peacock’s pitch saw it as a way for smaller streamers to reach new subscribers in a relatively uncluttered environment, and they hoped Peacock would eventually offer features such as the ability for streamers to offer free samples of their shows.

They described Peacock’s terms as favorable compared to Amazon, which has a large business selling subscriptions to programmers big and small, from HBO Max to Crunchyroll. Amazon’s channel terms vary by partner, but two partners told Business Insider in 2025 that Amazon’s subscription revenue cut was over 50% in their deals.

Peacock’s plans come at a time when streaming services — especially outside market leaders Netflix and Disney — face pressure to consolidate as they look to continue growing their subscriber bases while remaining profitable. Overall, paid streaming growth in the US has cooled, while cancellation rates have risen in the wake of price hikes.

Streamers like Peacock are trying to make themselves stickier

TV viewership growth for streamers in the US is largely stagnant, and subscribers are navigating an increasingly complex landscape. Streaming services are trying tactics like discounts and bundling to keep people from leaving their platforms.

Some other streaming platforms have adopted a marketplace approach that’s broader than what Peacock is contemplating. Amazon is by far the leader. Last year, Amazon reported that its “Channels” program accounted for about 25% of US streamer sign-ups, citing Antenna data. Roku, YouTube, and device makers like Samsung and LG also let people subscribe to streamers through their platforms.

Peacock, for its part, already sells add-on subscriptions to NBC Sports Regional Sports Networks, which it shares a corporate parent with. It also sells a bundle with Apple TV+ that involves cross-platform sampling and a discounted price.

Peacock, with less than 2% of TV watch time in the US, has struggled to grow its share of the TV pie, according to Nielsen. That makes it the second-smallest of the subscription streamers Nielsen measures, ahead only of Warner Bros. Discovery (1.4%), which includes Discovery+ and HBO Max.

US-only Peacock also has relatively few subscribers, with about 44 million. Its nearest rival, Paramount+, has around 79 million global subscribers, and both are well behind Netflix, which is No. 1 with more than 325 million subscribers.

Still, Peacock has far more subscribers than many specialty streamers. AMC Networks, for example, reported about 10 million subscribers across its portfolio of streamers, including AMC+, Acorn TV, and Shudder, as of the end of 2025.

“Peacock has been struggling,” said Alan Wolk, a media industry analyst. “There haven’t been a whole lot of reasons to watch it, so giving people another reason to subscribe is a smart idea. If you ask consumers what’s your biggest frustration with streamers, it’s always, ‘I can’t find anything.’ So the more you can put things together under one interface, the happier people will be.”

A global survey by Nielsen in November found more than 46% say it’s harder to find the content they want to watch because there are too many streamers, rising to 51% in the US, with people spending 14 minutes searching for what to watch and 49% likely to cancel because they can’t find something.

The survey also showed 66% of people expressed interest in a guide to present content information across all services.

James Faris contributed reporting.




Source link

Why-Berkshire-Hathaways-New-York-Times-bet-is-a-fitting.jpeg

Why Berkshire Hathaway’s New York Times bet is a fitting end to the Warren Buffett era

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway bought one new stock in his last quarter as CEO: The New York Times Company. It’s a fitting final bet for the Buffett era.

The famed investor’s conglomerate scooped up around 5.1 million shares of the newspaper publisher, securing a stake worth $352 million at December’s close, a Tuesday filing revealed.

The position’s small size points to one of Buffett’s two investment managers at the time — Ted Weschler and the since-departed Todd Combs — making the purchase.

Read all about it

Buffett is a lifelong lover of newspapers. He delivered 500,000 papers as a teenager running multiple routes, and for years, he challenged shareholders to best him at newspaper tossing during Berkshire’s annual meetings.

He went from throwing newspapers to owning dozens of publishers, including The Buffalo News and The Omaha World-Herald. He was close friends with the late publisher of The Washington Post, Katharine Graham, and one of the paper’s biggest financial backers.

By 2010, the billionaire stock picker was openly worried about declining circulation and advertising revenues for newspapers.

During Berkshire’s 2010 meeting, he recalled looking at the circulation of major titles such as the San Francisco Chronicle, and said it “blows your mind how fast people are dropping it.”

“The world has really changed, in terms of the essential nature of newspapers,” he said.

In 1965 or 1970, there was “probably nothing looked more bulletproof than a daily newspaper where the competition had melted away,” he continued. “But it’s a form of distributing information and entertainment that has lost its immediacy in many cases.”

Buffett pointed out that people no longer rely on papers to find out how their stocks were performing, or whether their sports team won. The resulting decline in circulation made newspapers less attractive to advertisers, he noted.

“And so you get this chicken and egg thing that the newspaper becomes less valuable as the advertisers float away, and the advertisers float away as the subscribers diminish,” he said.


Warren Buffett newspaper toss

Warren Buffett made the newspaper toss a fixture at Berkshire Hathaway’s shareholder meetings.



Rick Wilking/Reuters



Despite his concerns, he acquired 28 daily papers in the early 2010s.

“Charlie and I believe that papers delivering comprehensive and reliable information to tightly-bound communities and having a sensible Internet strategy will remain viable for a long time,” Buffett wrote in his 2012 letter to shareholders. “Charlie” referred to his late business partner, Charlie Munger.

“Newspapers continue to reign supreme … in the delivery of local news,” he added.

Buffett struck a far more bearish tone in 2019, telling Yahoo Finance that he expected only a few national titles, such as The New York Times, to survive, while the rest would “disappear.” He also bemoaned the demise of the newspaper ad business.

“It went from monopoly to franchise to competitive to … toast,” he said.

Berkshire’s surprise return

Buffett offloaded Berkshire’s newspapers to publisher Lee Enterprises in 2020. Given his long history in the newspaper business and eventual exit from it, it’s striking to see Berkshire return with its recent stock purchase.

One reason was undoubtedly The New York Times’ recovery in recent years. It grew revenues by 9% to $2.8 billion and its net income by 17% to $344 million last year, as subscription revenues rose 9% and advertising revenues jumped 12%.

A key driver was the paper’s addition of 1.4 million digital-only subscribers, which lifted its total subscriber count to 12.78 million as of December 31.

The publisher’s stock price has already seen some of the benefits. After collapsing from over $50 in mid-2002 to below $5 in early 2009, it has surged roughly 15-fold — including 50% in the past year — to trade at a record high of $74 at Tuesday’s close.

The shares gained another 3% in Wednesday’s premarket, perhaps marking one of the final cases of the “Buffett Effect,” where other investors mimic his buys and sells, moving markets.

The publisher’s comeback might explain why Buffett and his team decided to revisit one of his favorite industries so soon after turning the page.




Source link

charles

$20 billion Perplexity is making a big bet on ditching ads

Perplexity is going full steam ahead with subscriptions and business sales and plans to focus more on monetization than it has in the past, executives said at a roundtable with reporters on Monday.

The AI search startup, based in San Francisco, is the latest to publicly distance itself from putting ads in chatbot answers, with one executive saying it isn’t exploring any ad deals at the moment. That’s a contrast to OpenAI, which is going all in on ads, while arch-rival Anthropic has publicly touted the opposite.

One Perplexity executive said the startup is increasingly targeting large businesses. The company has only five people on its enterprise sales team and plans to ramp that up, the executive added. It also wants to serve high-powered users such as finance professionals, doctors, and CEOs.

The focus on selling to businesses positions Perplexity more directly as a competitor to startups like Glean, which lets employees search internal files and data more efficiently with AI.

The move comes amid some VC skepticism about Perplexity’s prospects, with Silicon Valley investors voting it the company they’d most like to bet against in an informal poll at an AI conference last year, amid back-to-back funding rounds and talks of a wider AI bubble.

Perplexity will focus more on revenue and revenue retention than on other metrics, such as the number of questions it answers, the executive said. Perplexity also pledged to keep allowing people to use the product for free, with rate limits.

At the roundtable, the company declined to share specific financials and shared that revenue grew 4.7 times last year. Perplexity generated over $150 million in annual recurring revenue by mid-last year, its head of communications Jesse Dwyer told Business Insider in August. It hit $200 million in ARR in October, Alex Heath of Sources reported.

The news comes after several months of the AI startup lying low, as Perplexity said in a press invite. The company’s leaders said it was busy building and not focusing on AI-related drama.

Perplexity had announced in 2024 that it would start experimenting with ads. That effort stalled, with the top ads leader, Taz Patel, quietly leaving last year. One consistent issue with ads in AI-generated answers is that users won’t believe them, the Perplexity executive said.

Perplexity also launched a product for enterprises in 2024 that uses internal and external data to generate research reports, among other features.




Source link

Polymarket-users-have-bet-over-2-million-so-far-predicting.jpeg

Polymarket users have bet over $2 million so far predicting the Golden Globes. Here’s who they say will win.

The awards show ballot was once an innocent watch-party game.

Now, millions of dollars are at stake.

Fans planning to watch the 83rd Golden Globe Awards are plowing money into prediction markets, hoping for a windfall if they correctly choose a winner.

Millions have so far been bet on Golden Globe winners on Polymarket, one of the leading prediction market platforms. This year, Polymarket partnered with the Golden Globes, which airs on CBS and Paramount+ on Sunday at 8 p.m. ET.

“The collaboration will bring real-time, market-driven insights across the Golden Globes live events and a broad digital and editorial ecosystem touching fans’ greatest passion points across entertainment, fashion and pop culture,” a joint press release said.

Prediction markets, such as Polymarket and Kalshi, allow users to buy and sell shares on the outcomes of future events, including sports games or presidential elections, potentially resulting in a payday. Polymarket also provides real-time updates, meaning the data can provide insights into how consumers and investors think.

The relatively new markets are not strictly regulated, leaving room for those with insider knowledge to game the system. A last-minute bet on Polymarket last week that Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro would be ousted netted strong returns after the US captured Maduro in a surprise raid hours later. A new bill proposed last week in response would prohibit government officials from insider trading on prediction markets.

For the Globes, fans have already bet nearly $2.5 million in contracts across 30 awards show categories on Polymarket, including Best Director and Best Motion Picture, as of Sunday afternoon.

So, who do betters think will win?

Predicted Winners on Polymarket

Best Director

On Polymarket, betters think Paul Thomas Anderson, whose film “One Battle After Another” also snagged Golden Globe noms, has a 94% chance of winning Best Director. Ryan Coogler, director of “Sinners,” is behind Anderson at 3%.

Best Actor — Drama winner

Betters gave Wagner Moura, who starred in “The Secret Agent,” a 73% chance of winning Best Actor in a motion picture drama. Michael B. Jordan of “Sinners” had a 24% chance.

Best Actor — Musical or Comedy winner

Timothee Chalamet, star of “Marty Supreme,” led with a 70% chance to win Best Actor in a Musical or Comedy motion picture on Sunday afternoon. Leonardo DiCaprio followed Chalamet at 17% for his work in “One Battle After Another.”

Best Actress — Drama winner

“Hamnet” star Jessie Buckley had a 96% of winning Best Actress in a drama motion picture. Behind Buckley, betters gave Renate Reinsve of “Sentimental Value” a 3% chance of winning.

Best Actress — Musical or Comedy winner

Polymarket betters think Rose Byrne has a 76% chance of winning a Golden Globe Award for her role in the film, “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You.” Emma Stone, star of “Bugonia,” came in second at 12%.

Best Motion Picture — Animated winner

On Polymarket, users gave Netflix’s “KPop Demon Hunters” a 92% chance of winning the top animation prize. “Acro,” written and directed by Ugo Bienvenu, followed at a 5% chance.

Best Motion Picture — Musical or Comedy winner

Betters on Polymarket threw their money behind “One Battle After Another” to win this category at 97%, beating “Marty Supreme,” which had a 2% chance.

Best Motion Picture — Drama winner

“Sinners” had the highest chance to win Best Motion Picture in the drama category on Polymarket at 55%. “Hamnet” came behind that at a 31% chance.




Source link

Theron Mohamed — Profile Picture

Warren Buffett’s Chevron bet stands to gain if the US delivers a Venezuelan oil boom

Investors are scrambling to identify potential winners from the US capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and President Donald Trump’s plan to “run” the nation and deliver an oil boom. Berkshire Hathaway is one contender thanks to its large bet on Chevron, the only US oil major still operating in Venezuela.

Berkshire — now led by Greg Abel following Warren Buffett’s recent retirement as CEO — is Chevron’s largest corporate shareholder with a 6% stake worth about $19 billion, assuming Berkshire hasn’t altered the wager since its latest portfolio update.

The conglomerate counted the oil major as its fifth-largest stock position at the end of September 2025, representing about 7% of the total $267 billion value of its US stock portfolio.

Berkshire poised to profit


Greg Abel

Greg Abel took over as Berkshire Hathaway CEO at the start of 2026.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images



Venezuela has the world’s largest proven crude oil reserves, but decades of underinvestment in its oil infrastructure mean it only produces about 1% of global oil output.

Chevron has secured short-term exemptions to US sanctions on Venezuela, allowing it to produce and export limited amounts of the country’s oil.

Rivals, including Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips, left Venezuela years ago following the nationalization of the country’s oil industry and government seizures of foreign-owned assets.

Trump said over the weekend that he envisions large US oil companies coming to Venezuela, fixing and modernizing its pipelines and refineries, and supercharging the country’s oil production.

Excited investors piled into oil stocks on Monday. Chevron shares surged as much as 6.3% on the day to a nine-month high of about $166, briefly valuing Berkshire’s stake at over $20 billion. They retreated on Tuesday but are still up nearly 3% so far in 2026.

Chevron already has stakes in five production projects in Venezuela, thanks to partnerships with affiliates of the country’s state oil company.

On an earnings call in August, CEO Mike Wirth highlighted Chevron’s deep foothold in the country. He said it has been operating in Venezuela for more than a century, and has “played an important role in regional energy security, as well as maintaining American economic interests.”

Chevron’s presence in Venezuela means it “stands to benefit from any reopening,” Maurizio Carulli, a global energy analyst at Quilter Cheviot, said in a Tuesday note.

The oil major has the personnel, licenses, and oil fields “ready to ramp up immediately,” Charles-Henry Monchau, CIO of Syz Group, also said in a note on Tuesday.

Not an overnight winner

Industry analysts have warned it will take years and huge sums to revitalize Venezuela’s oil sector, and US companies won’t want to invest heavily until they’re confident they won’t have assets seized or contracts changed down the line.

That suggests Venezuela won’t be an overnight game changer for Chevron or Berkshire.

Berkshire has further exposure to the oil industry via Occidental Petroleum, its next-largest stock holding after Chevron. It owns more than a quarter of the energy explorer and producer — a stake worth $11 billion today.

A Chevron spokesperson told Business Insider in a statement: “Chevron remains focused on the safety and wellbeing of our employees, as well as the integrity of our assets. We continue to operate in full compliance with all relevant laws and regulations.”




Source link