FedEx-and-UPS-charged-fees-for-collecting-tariffs-Now-customers.jpeg

FedEx and UPS charged fees for collecting tariffs. Now, customers want that money back.

Another legal fight over tariffs is brewing — this time, over the fees shipping services such as FedEx and UPS charge to handle the duties.

After the Supreme Court ruled many of President Donald Trump’s tariffs unconstitutional last month, some companies sued the federal government seeking refunds. Some, like FedEx, said publicly that they would pass along any tariff refunds that they get to businesses and consumers who ultimately paid them.

The tariffs themselves aren’t the only charges customers got stuck with, though. Shipping services, including FedEx and UPS, also tacked on brokerage fees and other charges to the tariff bills they sent customers.

A half-dozen recent lawsuits filed by customers against shipping companies are seeking refunds for those fees, too.

The lawsuits argue that the shipping companies never should have charged the fees in the first place, and that the shippers, not the government, owe the customers. In some cases, the fees totaled as much as the cost of the tariffs themselves.

The shippers “made the decision to assess that additional fee,” John Yanchunis, an attorney at Morgan & Morgan, a firm that filed a lawsuit against FedEx over tariffs and brokerage fees, told Business Insider.

The plaintiff in Yanchunis’ lawsuit, a South Florida resident who ordered a pair of tennis shoes from Germany with a declared value of $140, received a $36 bill from FedEx. The bill included $21 in now-unconstitutional tariffs and $15 in “FedEx’s customs brokerage and duty advancement fees,” according to the complaint.

Yanchunis said that his case aims to get compensation independent of FedEx’s lawsuit over the tariffs themselves. “Why should consumers have to wait for Federal Express or any other company to battle it out with the government?” he said.

At least five similar lawsuits, most seeking class-action status, have been filed against either FedEx or UPS since the Supreme Court’s ruling last month.

A FedEx spokesperson did not comment on whether the company plans to refund brokerage fees for shipments subject to the tariffs. The spokesperson pointed to a February statement in which the company said, “if refunds are issued to FedEx, we will issue refunds to the shippers and consumers who originally bore those charges,” though it did not mention related fees.

A UPS spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

FedEx and UPS could face questions about costs in court

For average consumers, the fees became apparent this past summer when Trump ended the de minimis loophole, which had allowed shipments valued at less than $800 to enter the US duty-free. Consumers began receiving tariff bills from UPS and FedEx for international shipments containing everything from wine from Italy to camera lenses from Japan.

Some customers told Business Insider that UPS also charged them late fees and threatened to send their bills to collections as they attempted to correct errors, such as incorrect tariff rates.

Some of the lawsuits against FedEx and UPS argue that, like the tariffs themselves, the companies never had standing to collect the brokerage fees.

“Even if FedEx refunds the void duties, the brokerage fees remain unlawful charges for which there was no lawful basis,” the complaint in Yanchunis’ lawsuit reads.

While the US government has collected $133 billion in IEEPA tariffs — those that were ruled unconstitutional — it’s not clear how much shipping services such as FedEx and UPS have collected in fees.

UPS said in its annual report filed earlier this year that, despite having to adjust to the tariffs, the company “achieved revenue growth of 3.4%” in its supply chain solutions business, “driven, in part, by brokerage results.” Its brokerage business also contributed to the company’s operating profit, according to the report.

Deciding how much of the brokerage fees companies like FedEx and UPS might have to pay back would be tricky, said Adam Hanover, managing director of restructuring and dispute resolution at advisory firm CohnReznick.

Courts handling the lawsuits might have to decide how much of the brokerage fees were the companies’ actual costs and how much they took as profit, Hanover said. FedEx and UPS pay their own in-house brokerage teams, which handle many of the tariffed shipments, for example.

FedEx cited “customs-related brokerage fees due to the removal of the de minimis exemption” as a factor that increased its operating expenses in recent quarters, according to the company’s quarterly filing.

“You can really go down a rabbit hole on this one,” he said.

Patrick Penfield, professor of supply chain practice at Syracuse University’s Whitman School of Management, said that FedEx’s $15 charge on the shoes in Yanchunis’ case seems “somewhat excessive” for such a low-value consumer good. FedEx says it charges either $15 or 2% of an item’s value, whichever is greater, for shipments valued at less than $800.

The lawsuits are likely to determine whether those fees actually were excessive — and how much consumers could get back.

“FedEx is entitled to some money, but I think it was a little bit too much money,” Penfield said.

Do you have a story to share about tariffs? Contact this reporter at abitter@businessinsider.com or via encrypted messaging app Signal at 808-854-4501. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.




Source link

Head-of-LA-homeless-nonprofit-charged-with-pocketing-millions-splurging.jpeg

Head of LA homeless nonprofit charged with pocketing millions, splurging on luxuries including a Hermès jacket and a trip to Vegas

Authorities have found that some funding to combat homelessness in California has instead ended up in Greece.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has accused Alexander Soofer, manager of LA-based housing organization Abundant Blessing, of “a years-long scheme to defraud the City and County of Los Angeles and other public entities providing funding for homeless housing.”

According to a complaint filed on Friday, while paying his staff “minimal wages” and feeding residents at his housing sites “ramen noodles, canned beans, and breakfast bars,” Soofer pocketed at least $10 million “through bank accounts associated with other businesses in his and his wife’s names” for personal expenses after “fraudulently obtaining” $23 million in public funding.

Federal officials said that between 2018 and 2025, Soofer’s organization received more than $5 million directly from the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and over $17 million through other nonprofits.

Investigators found Soofer’s misuse of funds includes $47,000 in luxury home purchases from stores like Restoration Hardware, $15,000 at Hermès, $15,000 at Chanel, $1,000 for cosmetic dermatology, and $4,500 for a four-night stay at the Wynn Las Vegas.

Authorities said they have yet to determine what Soofer bought at Chanel, but listed his purchases at Hermès as including a $1,250 pair of men’s Paris calf-skin loafers, a $910 pair of women’s Chypre sandals, a $455 Chevaux en Symetrie tie, and a $2,450 men’s trotting jacket.


Screenshot

The same Hermes trotting vest that the authorities listed in the photo section of the complaint.

Screenshot



In addition to luxury brands, the complaint said there is at least one property under his name associated with the misappropriated funds. That property in question is located in Greece and relates to “a $475,000 check issued from an Abundant Blessings bank account.”

The case against Soofer feeds into concerns that California’s efforts to combat homelessness may be ineffective and inconsistent despite large spending. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, as of 2024, the state had over 187,000 homeless people, representing about 24% of the nation’s total.

State Auditor Grant Parks wrote in a 2024 report to Gov. Gavin Newsom and lawmakers that, when his department analyzed five housing programs that received approximately $13.7 billion in combined funding, only two were “likely cost-effective.”

Parks also added in the report that, between fiscal years 2018-2023, California cities lacked reliable data to track cost efficiency and outcomes needed to fully understand why the problem didn’t improve, despite the billions spent by more than 30 housing programs.

The attorney’s office of the Central District of California referred Business Insider to the press release and did not comment further. An attorney for Soofer and the Governor’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.




Source link

Brooklyn-man-23-is-charged-in-15-million-Coinbase-customer-care.jpeg

Brooklyn man, 23, is charged in $15 million Coinbase ‘customer-care’ scheme

A young Brooklyn man has been charged with stealing $15 million by impersonating a Coinbase customer care representative.

In a criminal complaint, Ronald Spektor, 23, is accused of tricking some 100 victims from across the United States into turning over the passwords for their cryptocurrency accounts, under the guise that their assets were at risk.

The “long term larceny scheme” began in April 2023 and continued until his arrest on December 4, the complaint alleges. Since then, Spektor has been held in Rikers Island, in lieu of bail set at $500,000 cash or $1 million bond.

Spektor faces top charges of grand larceny and money laundering, each carrying a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison. He is also charged with possessing stolen property and the personal information of his alleged victims.

“Mr. Spektor has pleaded not guilty,” his attorney, Todd Spodek, told Business Insider. “We’re working to secure his release early next week and will challenge the charges in court.”

Some 70 victims have been interviewed by investigators with the NYPD and the Kings County District Attorney’s Office, the complaint alleges.

“Each Coinbase user confirmed that prior to the loss of their cryptocurrency, said Coinbase users were contacted over the phone by someone who purported to be a legitimate Coinbase employee,” prosecutors allege in the complaint.

“The purported employee informed them their assets were at risk and needed to be moved to a new wallet,” the complaint alleges, using the term for the applications that store cryptocurrency.

Believing they were communicating “with a legitimate employee,” the victims then gave Spektor their seed phrases — a sequence of 12 to 24 words that act like a password — and moved their cryptocurrency to wallets that Spektor controlled, the complaint alleges.

“Their cryptocurrency was immediately withdrawn without their permission,” the complaint continues. The stolen crypto then “passed through cryptocurrency wallets belonging to the defendant,” it says.

Last year, a Coinbase user in California lost more than $6 million, and another user from California lost $1 million, the complaint alleges.

Investigators traced more than $5 million in stolen funds to Spektor’s accounts with two online gambling services, the complaint alleges. Millions more were converted into cash or laundered through online coin swapping services, according to the complaint.

Spektor’s iPhone contained a wealth of incriminating evidence, investigators said.

The complaint alleges that this includes conversations on the online platform Discord in which he bragged “that he had made millions of dollars’ worth of cryptocurrency through scamming, used social engineering to obtain Coinbase seed phrases, and had lost six million dollars worth of cryptocurrency through gambling.”

The phone also contained communications with his father from November 2024 in which “they discussed, in sum and substance, concealing the financial proceeds of the Coinbase scheme.”

The complaint continues, “Other messages show that the defendant asked his father to dispose of his hardware wallets” and asked his mother “to purchase a new hardware wallet.” Hardware wallets are devices resembling USB drives that store private cryptocurrency data offline.

Spektor’s Telegram handle was “@LOLIMFEELINGEVIL” and his account included discussions “of successful Coinbase phishing attacks, and efforts to recruit others to join the scheme,” the complaint also alleges.

According to the complaint, a Google account associated with Spektor contained “approximately 29 text messages containing personal identifying information in the form of tens of thousands of individuals’ email addresses and associated passwords.”

Spektor’s attorney, Spodek, told Business Insider that his client has been aware of the investigation by Brooklyn prosecutors’ Virtual Currency Unit “for over a year.”

“The allegations are speculative and based on incomplete information,” said Spodek, whose other cryptocurrency cases include Instagram influencer and crypto-scammer Jay Manzini (sentenced to seven years in prison last year) and Amir Bruno Elmaani (sentenced to four years prison in 2023).

“Once the full picture comes out, this case will look very different,” Spodek added.




Source link