Americans-are-drinking-less-than-they-have-in-decades-Trump.jpeg

Americans are drinking less than they have in decades. Trump policies are driving the slowdown.

Donald Trump is giving Americans a fair amount of reasons to drink these days — threatening to obliterate Iran, or flirting with a takeover of Greenland. But the president is, perhaps counterintuitively, also part of why people are laying off the booze. Trump’s policies and rhetoric are killing America’s buzz.

Americans are drinking less than they have in decades. While a long-term cultural shift toward moderation is very real, the immediate cyclical indicators — meaning the regular ebbs and flows — are all pointing down. And Trump is nudging them in that direction.

The amount of alcoholic beverages consumed across major markets declined by 2% in 2025, according to data from drinks data company IWSR. In the United States, volumes were down by 5%. Consumption of beer, wine, and spirits all fell. (The only bright spot: ready-to-drink cocktails, which are getting more popular.)

A lot of what’s going on here isn’t about Gen Z being teetotalers or American adults being spooked about alcohol causing cancer — it’s about the economic and political environment. People are drinking less because of the ongoing affordability crisis. The Trump administration’s aggressive immigration policies have had a chilling effect on Hispanics’ consumption. All the tariff whiplash has been far from fun for the alcohol industry. Mounting uncertainty has consumers uneasy and, in turn, taking a break from the bar.

Marten Lodewijks, the president and managing director of IWSR, says the woes for the booze industry is an example of “death by a thousand cuts.”

It just so happens that the president of the United States is the one holding the knife.


Americans are forgoing adult beverages for a multitude of reasons, most of which boil down to pressures on their wallets. While the president says the economy is “roaring,” the data suggest otherwise. Prices have fallen as Trump promised — they’re up by some 25% since 2020, and the most recent inflation data show signs of reacceleration. The war in Iran has pushed average gas prices in the US above $4 a gallon. Consumer sentiment is at a record low. Student loan payments are ramping back up. Healthcare costs are through the roof.

“We are seeing the pressure on affordability escalate,” says Nadine Sarwat, an analyst who covers beverages and cannabis at Bernstein.

Now, everyone gets a single glass of wine with dinner and goes home.

Tariffs have been a complicated piece of the puzzle. On the corporate side, the will-he-or-won’t-he dance around import taxes has made planning and forecasting hard. Large manufacturers have largely managed to eat the varying tariff costs, aware that jerking around prices could turn off wary consumers. But even the Supreme Court striking down many of the president’s blanket tariffs hasn’t left the industry in the clear. Aluminum tariffs are still in place, which hurt beer brands that need it for their cans. They especially sting now that aluminum prices have skyrocketed, in part due to the Iran war.

“A fair amount of aluminum goes through the Strait of Hormuz, and it is very energy-intensive. So when energy prices go up, aluminum prices go up,” says Bart Watson, the president and CEO of the Brewers Association, a trade association that represents craft brewers. Some members have seen the price of their cans increase by 25-30% this year, he says.


beer manufacturing cans

Trump’s tariffs on aluminum have increased the cost of cans for beermakers. 

Bloomberg/Getty Images



Alcohol is recession-resistant, but it’s not recession-proof. Drinkers are looking for ways to cut spending, and that Friday six-pack is discretionary-ish. Sarwat says this moment looks different than during, say, the Great Recession, when consumers traded down to cheaper brands and bought bigger pack sizes to get more bang for their buck. Instead, people are sticking to the more premium brand they like, but opting for smaller pack sizes to save money. Or they’re grabbing canned cocktails — the aforementioned bright spot for the industry — even if a bottle of wine or vodka may have been the more logical economic choice.

“This cycle is a lot more about cash outlay and perceived value for money as opposed to actual value per unit of alcohol,” she says.

Eye-popping prices at bars and restaurants are also prompting people to cut back. A night out with friends used to be a pre-dinner cocktail, a shared bottle of wine with the meal, and a nightcap. Now, everyone gets a single glass of wine with dinner and goes home.


Trump’s economy isn’t the only thing giving drinkers the heebie jeebies.

ICE crackdowns and tougher immigration enforcement, on top of economic concerns, have had a widespread chilling effect on Hispanic consumers. In January, Constellation Brands CEO William Newlands said on an earnings call that Hispanic consumers were the main reason its beer category was “challenged” as they were being much more careful about their spending. (Constellation’s portfolio includes Corona and Modelo.)

“There was just a reduction in foot traffic as Hispanic consumers went to places they felt safe, didn’t stretch out and take any risky trips or unnecessary trips, and that’s historically a very big beer-drinking cohort,” says Dave Williams, an alcohol industry analyst and consultant.

Hispanic consumers have also been more nervous about going to work, leading to reduced income and, in turn, less spending. It does, however, appear they are beginning to revert to the norm. In its April earnings call, Constellation said they’re buying again.

There was just a reduction in foot traffic as Hispanic consumers went to places they felt safe.

The decline in international tourism to the US has taken a bite out of sales for bars and breweries in areas that generally depend on those travelers for traffic. Watson, from the Brewers Association, says Canadians refusing to come south of the border is smarting for some of their members.

“Talk to breweries in Vermont, they’ll say, ‘Yeah, traffic’s down,'” he says. “For the national numbers, does it move them a ton? Probably not, but at the margins and for individual members matters a lot” He adds that “snowbird places,” such as California and Florida, have complained of people “just not showing up” this year and last from abroad.

Angry Canadians are hurting America’s whiskey industry, too. Many stores up north pulled US-made products off the shelves after Trump started talking about making Canada the 51st state and antagonizing the US’s ally, and they haven’t put those products back.

“The entire Canadian population basically said, ‘No, we’re not supporting this industry and this country,'” Lodewijks, from IWSR, says. Anecdotally, he’s heard similar things have happened in Germany and France.


To be sure, the Trump administration isn’t all bad for the alcohol industry. One important bright spot: The White House’s new dietary guidelines, released in January, were pretty ambivalent about alcohol and advised people to “limit” intake without offering specifics. Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was even more lenient. At a White House briefing, he said alcohol is a “social lubricant that brings people together,” and while ideally people probably wouldn’t drink, the health benefits of getting together with friends may mean that the deleterious effects of a few beers come out in the wash. “The implication is don’t have it for breakfast,” he said.

It may not be a ringing endorsement, Williams says, but the messaging from the White House “didn’t make it any worse than it was in the mind of the consumer.”

Consumers have a lot weighing on them, and the economy and the world feel increasingly uncertain. This level of uncertainty doesn’t usually bode well for alcohol. As a general rule, election years aren’t good for booze consumption, and while 2026 may not be a huge election year (though it’s not an insignificant one), it is one filled with a lot of unknowns.

“We can all agree that the political situation remains very tumultuous,” Lodewijk, putting it lightly, says. The conflict in Iran escalates and de-escalates by the hour. Rising oil prices threaten to put everything from grocery store staples to summer vacations out of reach. In the US and in the world, it’s a volatile moment, and much of that volatility is emanating from the Oval Office.

The alcohol industry has a lot of problems right now, and Trump is, indeed, one of them.


Emily Stewart is a senior correspondent at Business Insider, writing about business and the economy.

Business Insider’s Discourse stories provide perspectives on the day’s most pressing issues, informed by analysis, reporting, and expertise.




Source link

The-Army-is-getting-a-new-lethal-hand-grenade-for.jpeg

The Army is getting a new lethal hand grenade for the first time in decades

For the first time in nearly six decades, the US Army is getting a new lethal hand grenade.

The Army cleared the new M111 Offensive Hand Grenade for full production this week. The new blast overpressure grenade is replacing the now-obsolete MK3A2 grenades, which were first adopted by the military in 1968, around the same time as the M67 fragmentation grenade.

The Capabilities Program Executive Ammunition and Energetics, together with US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Armaments Center at Picatinny Arsenal, developed the new hand grenade, the first for the Army since Vietnam.

The M111 is made of plastic that is consumed during detonation. The older MK3A2 blast/concussion grenades, on the other hand, were made from asbestos, a carcinogenic substance that forced the service to put restrictions on the use of these grenades. The old M67 grenades are still in use.

The value of having a blast overpressure grenade is that it decreases the risk of unintentional fratricide, the accidental killing of one’s own troops at war, during close-quarters combat, but the limitations on the use of the MK3A2 meant soldiers only had the fragmentation M67 available to them in combat.

The M67 grenade propels metal fragments outward in all directions when it explodes. In tight indoor spaces like rooms or hallways, those fragments can bounce off walls or be blocked by furniture, reducing effectiveness and potentially hurting friendly troops.

The M111 grenade, similar to the MK3A2, works differently, instead producing a powerful blast and pressure wave less likely to be stopped by walls or obstacles, making it more effective inside buildings and other confined spaces.

“One of the key lessons learned from the door-to-door urban fighting in Iraq was the M67 grenade wasn’t always the right tool for the job. The risk of fratricide on the other side of the wall was too high,” said Col. Vince Morris, the Army project manager for close combat systems, in a service press statement.

Using blast overpressure instead, “can clear a room of enemy combatants quickly leaving nowhere to hide while ensuring the safety of friendly forces,” he said.

Soldiers can still use the M67 fragmentation hand grenade in open terrain, the statement said, but should rely on the newer version for “enclosed and restricted terrain.”

Blast overpressure weapons can be harmful for troops using them, and the US military has been grappling with the effects of these systems. Service members, as a result of their continuous work with artillery, breaching charges, and other heavy weaponry, have suffered traumatic brain injuries, which can come with debilitating effects.

The Army, along with other services, has sought to mitigate these risks.




Source link

Anderson-Cooper-is-leaving-CBSs-60-Minutes-after-nearly-2.jpeg

Anderson Cooper is leaving CBS’s ’60 Minutes’ after nearly 2 decades

  • Anderson Cooper is leaving CBS’s “60 Minutes” after two decades in the gig.
  • The correspondent said he balanced his CNN and CBS jobs for 20 years.
  • Now, he’s quitting one gig to spend more time with his children.

Anderson Cooper has called it quits on CBS’s “60 Minutes” after nearly two decades with the show.

Cooper, who is a political commentator on CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360” and a correspondent on “60 Minutes,” said on Monday that he would be leaving the latter job.

“Being a correspondent at 60 Minutes has been one of the great honors of my career,” he said in a statement to multiple news outlets.

“For nearly twenty years, I’ve been able to balance my jobs at CNN and CBS, but I have little kids now and I want to spend as much time with them as possible, while they still want to spend time with me,” he added.

Cooper, 58, joined “60 Minutes” in 2006 and has become one of its most recognizable hosts.

In a statement to Business Insider, a CBS spokesperson said, “For more than two decades, Anderson Cooper has taken 60 Minutes viewers on journeys to faraway places, told us unforgettable stories, reported consequential investigations and interviewed many prominent figures.”

“We’re grateful to him for dedicating so much of his life to this broadcast, and understand the importance of spending more time with family,” the spokesperson added. “60 Minutes will be here if he ever wants to return.”

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.




Source link

I-moved-back-to-Australia-after-decades-in-the-US.jpeg

I moved back to Australia after decades in the US. The culture shock stunned me

When I was in my early 30s, I went for a three-week holiday to my home in Sydney and never left.

For years, I had toyed with the idea of moving back home, a place I had not lived since I was 7 years old. I’d even made a couple of attempts at it, but the comfortable pull of family and more than 25 years of life in the US always lured me back.

When extending my trip week by week turned into deciding to stay, I assumed slotting back into life in Australia would be the easiest move of my life. After all, I was used to adjusting to a new environment. My father’s job in the film industry meant I spent my childhood moving frequently (13 different schools in multiple cities and countries).

Surely moving back home would feel as comforting as slipping on a well-worn, much-loved cardigan. I was wrong.

The unexpected culture shock of coming home

I never thought I would experience culture shock moving back to Australia, but that was exactly what happened. All my years overseas meant I had missed large parts of general knowledge, I didn’t understand cultural references or sayings, and I found Australian politics completely befuddling.

Although I still sounded Australian, a quick conversation, which inexplicably always started with “where did you go to high school?” quickly established I was not from here. After being viewed as a foreigner my whole life in the US, I was now viewed as a foreigner in Australia, too.

What’s more, I realized with surprise that I was culturally very American. All the things I had taken for granted in the US (convenience, customer service, and affordability) just didn’t exist in Australia.

I had to do some life adjustments

There were the daily frustrations of not being able to get a coffee past 3 p.m. (or before 7 a.m.), no salad bars or real Mexican food, and the expense of absolutely everything (Sydney is Australia’s most expensive city).

Cultural norms were an even bigger adjustment. Handshakes for acquaintances and bear hugs for friends (standard etiquette in the US) were replaced with one or two kisses to the side of (not on) the cheek.

Making friends with Sydney-siders felt hard, so I initially gravitated toward foreigners who were generally open and friendly. When I’d meet Americans, I felt an innate level of comfort and familiarity unlike anything else.

I had expected it to be easy to move back

In my first year back home, I thought a lot about the phrase “you can never go home again.” I’d always been pretty dismissive of it, believing I could return to Australia at any time and it would feel like home. Finally, I came to understand the truth in the phrase. We just can’t return to a previous place or point in life and recapture our original experience.

Just like I adjusted to the culture shock of moving to the US as a little girl (hello, mayo on sandwiches, ice in water, and excessive air conditioning), I needed to acclimatize to Australia. I had been making the move so much harder than it needed to be because I expected it to be easy and familiar.

As I started to let go of the expectation that I’d fit right in, I started to feel more at home, back home. I built up experiences and connections that grounded me, and as I got older, my American background became less noticeable and less relevant. It’s taken a long time, but I now feel entirely at home here. In the end, the key was to start from scratch and get to know my hometown as an adult, rediscovering my Australian identity along the way.




Source link