Headshot photo of Laura Italiano

Ten women testified that three wealthy brothers drugged and attacked them. Here’s what a federal jury must decide.

Three wealthy brothers, 10 rape accusers, one shocking indictment.

On Monday, the Alexander brothers — a trio who enjoyed money, good looks, and access to expensive homes and resorts around the world — will sit through the third day of deliberations in their federal sex-trafficking trial.

A Manhattan jury is considering the fates of these three men, former luxury real estate brokers Tal and Oren Alexander, and Oren’s twin brother Alon, who worked for his parents’ private security firm.

There is much to weigh.

Ten women, all testifying under pseudonyms, told jurors they were raped — sometimes through violence, sometimes after being drugged senseless, sometimes by more than one brother at once.

None called the police.

Prosecutors have argued that there was too much corroborating evidence, too much genuine pain in the women’s words for their accounts to be false.

Defense lawyers countered that the sex was consensual, and that the women later invented or imagined stories of violence and violation out of regret or in hopes of a lawsuit payday.

After testimony by more than 30 prosecution witnesses and three witnesses for the defense, a six-man, six-woman jury must now agree on a complex, ten-count indictment that could put the brothers away for life.

Here is a count-by-count roadmap to that still-pending decision.


The Hamptons backyard where the youngest accuser in the Alexander brothers sex-trafficking trial says she was raped after being handed a drugged drink in hot tub.

The Hamptons backyard where the youngest accuser in the Alexander brothers sex-trafficking trial says she was raped after being handed a drugged drink in a hot tub.

Southern District of New York/Business Insider



Count one: sex trafficking conspiracy

All three brothers are charged with conspiring to sex traffic four women who testified they were lured with something of value (a Hamptons beach getaway), only to be drugged or overpowered and then raped.

The youngest testified that she was drugged and raped at a Hamptons party by two brothers and two other men in 2009, after sneaking away from her boarding school, missing her high school prom.

To convict on this top count, jurors must find that between 2008 and 2021, the Alexanders worked together to get at least one of the four women to the Hamptons with the purpose of attacking her. They must also find that, for at least one woman, force, fraud, or coercion was then used to compel sex with at least one of the brothers.

All three brothers are charged with this count, which carries a potential sentence of 10 years to life in prison.

Count two: the sex trafficking Lindsey Acree

Lindsey Acree, who has a lawsuit pending against the brothers, told jurors that she was 25 when she and a girlfriend were invited to the siblings’ East Hampton rental home in 2011.

Acree said that soon after arriving, she was urged to enjoy the backyard jacuzzi, where Tal handed her a glass of wine that made her feel like a “zombie.”

She said that when she regained consciousness, Tal and a second man were raping her on the floor of the home’s gym.

At some point in her assault, Tal set up a tripod and camera, she said. “They were laughing a lot,” she told jurors of the two men. “I was on the ground. I couldn’t move.”

Tal alone is charged with this count.

Count three: Sex Trafficking Bela Koval

Bela Koval, a native of Ukraine, told jurors she was a 25-year-old model when Alon paid for her and a girlfriend to fly from Chicago to New York for a weekend at the brothers’ Sag Harbor rental home in 2016.

All three brothers greeted the women at the door, she said. They were taken yachting and served meals prepared by a private chef — expenses that prosecutors say the brothers shared.

Koval told the jury that at a pool party the next day, she sipped a drink handed to her by Oren that made her unsteady, “like a wave overtook my body.”

She said she felt still worse — “like my whole body was tranquilized” — after Alon gave her a glass of water. “I was unable to scream” as Oren raped her, she testified.

All three brothers are charged with sex-trafficking Koval.


An evidence photo in the Alexander brothers sex-trafficking trial shows the Hamptons mansion where two women testified they were drugged and raped.

An evidence photo shows the Sag Harbor mansion where Maya Miller testified she was raped by Tal Alexander in 2014.

Southern District of New York/Business Insider



Count four: sex trafficking Maya Miller

Maya Miller told jurors she was a 23-year-old aspiring model and about to enter nursing school when she and a girlfriend were invited by Tal to a summer weekend at the brothers’ Sag Harbor home in 2014.

Miller told the jury that she agreed because Tal promised to reimburse her for her flight from Nevada to New York and that the trip would be all-expenses-paid.

“It was the biggest home I’d ever been in,” she said of the mansion, where she and her friend were treated to a boat ride and meals by a private chef.

Tal turned “angry” as she remained sober through the second day, telling her, “I thought I invited fun girls,” Miller testified.

She testified that Tal raped her in the shower the next morning as she cried and struggled to scream.

Tal alone is charged with this count.


This exhibit from the Alexander brothers sex-trafficking trial shows a photograph of the living room of the Sag Harbor mansion where women testified they were raped in 2014 and 2016.

An evidence photo shows the Hamptons mansion where Isa Brooks testified she was raped by Tal Alexander, Alon Alexander, and two other men in 2009.

Southern District of New York/Business Insider



Count five: sex trafficking a minor

This final sex-trafficking count concerns Isa Brooks.

The Netherlands native testified she was 16 when she and a dormmate skipped their high school prom to accept a party promoter’s invite to the brothers’ Southampton mansion in 2009.

“I always heard it was, like, the place to be on Memorial Day weekend,” she said of the Hamptons.

She told the jury that during a party hours later, after drinking tequila in the backyard hot tub, “I was feeling woozy, kind of spinny.”

Brooks said she stumbled to a bedroom, where Tal began kissing her, and told her “his brother was going to join us.”

Brooks told the jury that she fell in and out of consciousness, and remembered “in flashes” being raped by Tal, Alon — the “more shy” twin — and two other men, including the one who’d given her tequila in the hot tub.

“I was wondering why they hated me,” she told the jury.

Tal and Alon are charged with this count.


Prosecutor Andrew Jones questioned Bela Koval, who testified she was raped by Oren Alexander in 2016.

Prosecutor Andrew Jones questioned Bela Koval, who testified she was raped by Oren Alexander in 2016.

Jane Rosenberg/Reuters



Count six: inducing Bela Koval to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity

This count concerns Bela Koval, the woman who testified she was raped by Oren after being invited to Sag Harbor in 2016.

It alleges that the three brothers caused Koval to travel across state lines, from Chicago to New York, so that she could be forced or coerced into “unlawful sexual activity,” meaning her alleged rape by Oren Alexander.

Prosecutors sought to prove this count by showing jurors communications among the brothers, including a text chain in which they mentioned Koval and her girlfriend, and joked about trying to “orgy them out.” All three brothers are charged with this count.

Count seven: inducing Maya Miller to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity

This count concerns Maya Miller, the woman who testified she was raped by Tal in the shower of a Sag Harbor mansion in 2014.

Tal alone is charged with this count.


An evidence photo from the Alexander brothers sex-trafficking trial shows the Norwegian Sky cruise ship where a woman says she was raped by Alon and Oren Alexander in 2012.

The Norwegian Sky cruise ship, where a woman says she was raped by Alon and Oren Alexander in 2012.

Southern District of New York/Business Insider



Count eight: aggravated sexual abuse by force or intoxicant

This count alleges that Alon and his twin Oren sexually abused a heavily-drugged Rhonda Stone in the cabin of a Norwegian Sky cruise ship in 2012.

Stone testified she was 23 years old when she and her older sister went on a so-called “Groove Cruise” — a three-day trip to Miami and the Bahamas featuring round-the-clock live music and DJs.

She said she lost consciousness after drinking a mixed drink handed to her by one of the brothers, and woke up “naked in the bed,” and unable to move or speak as the two took turns raping her.

Alon and Oren Alexander are charged with this count.

Count nine: sexual abuse of a physically incapacitated person

This count offers an alternate theory of sexual abuse and also concerns Rhonda Stone and the 2012 cruise trip.

To convict, the jury must find that Stone was “physically incapable of declining participation” in a sexual act.

Alon and Oren are charged with this count.


A courthouse sketch of Amelia Rosen, an accuser in the Alexander brothers sex trafficking trial in New York.

Amelia Rosen testified she was 17 years old when Oren Alexander filmed her having sex with himself and a second man.

Jane Rosenberg/Reuters



Count 10: sexual exploitation of a minor

This count concerns Amelia Rosen, who prosecutors allege was 17 years old and incapacitated when she was videotaped having sex with Oren and a second man in a Manhattan apartment in 2009.

Jurors appeared visibly upset when the video was shown to them in court. Prosecutors said it shows Rosen slurring her words and barely able to stand.

“I can hardly understand what I was saying,” Rosen testified tearfully when shown snippets of the video in court.

Oren alone is charged with this count.




Source link

Peter Kafka

Billionaires like Jeff Bezos can save The Washington Post until they decide they won’t. We need a better model.

The cuts at The Washington Post are brutal.

They are brutal for the paper’s readers, who lose crucial coverage like sports and international reporting. And they are brutal for hundreds of Post employees, including lots of people whose work I pay to read with my Post subscription.

The Post’s cuts have also led lots of people to point out the obvious — that Post owner Jeff Bezos, who is currently the world’s fourth-richest man, worth an estimated $261 billion, could easily fund the paper’s losses … forever, without ever noticing the tab.

For the record: I also wish that Bezos would take his loose change and spend it on journalism.

Note that I didn’t say “journalism instead of” because when you are talking about Bezos-level wealth, you don’t have to choose: You can pay for journalism and rockets and superyachts and Venetian weddings and parties in St. Barts. (And yes, I realize that Bezos’ Amazon expenditures on things like the “Melania” doc are different from Bezos’ personal spending. The point is, he can afford it. In the same way that I can afford to buy a fancy coffee now and then.)

I’m also not weighing in on how much of the Post’s problems are the same problems facing every news organization, versus ones Bezos exacerbated by pivoting toward Trump. Or whether the new Post plan — focus on a handful of topics it thinks will resonate with a national audience, like politics and wellness — makes sense or is simply a too-late move already made by many Post competitors.

But the focus on Bezos underscores the problem the Post has been facing for years: It was a money-losing operation that relied on a billionaire’s goodwill. First, to buy it from its previous owners, who let it go for the price of a Joe Rogan podcast deal, and then to fund its losses for years.

Maybe Bezos really is sick of paying for the Post’s losses. Maybe funding the Post no longer syncs with a turns out, Donald Trump is actually good now, worldview. The point is that the Post has been in the can’t-win position of hoping Jeff Bezos would continue to fund those losses for years. Now he doesn’t want to. (Bezos has yet to comment publicly on the cuts; Matt Murray, the Post’s top editor, told his staff that the cuts are meant to help “reinvent The Washington Post for this new era. This work is difficult, but is essential.”)

Which, again, points out how precarious a position just about every news organization in the US is in right now.

There are a handful of really excellent publications, which are controlled by billionaires or very wealthy families — The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg News — that are aimed at an upscale, national audience, and they are doing well. There are some thriving startups and niche publications that tend to focus on topics that rich people — or their employers — will pay to learn more about. (Several of them, it turns out, are focused on power and Washington, DC — a sector the Post should have owned.) And there are various forms of aggregators that make a living by repackaging news other people generate, like newsletter publisher 1440.

And that’s … kind of it. The local news market is so bad we routinely use the word “desert” to describe it. There have been many attempts to solve that, and people keep trying new ways to tackle the problem. I wish all of them well because we really, really need local news. TV news is contracting because TV is contracting. Magazines are now frequently “brands attached to hotels or travel agencies.”

Faced with this grim reality, it’s natural to look at Bezos and think: Just pay for it. And again — I wish he would. But relying on billionaire goodwill is a hope, not a plan.

Journalism — no matter how much we right-size, automate, and innovate — is expensive. And up until the internet, journalism usually existed in the US in spite of those costs because it was bundled with other things people (subscribers, advertisers) were willing to pay for.

Now that bundle has been torn apart, so we need both new models that support what we have today — and ownership structures that will be satisfied with self-sustaining businesses, not ones with huge profit expectations. If I knew how to do that, I’d be doing it. I just know that hoping a billionaire will fix it isn’t the answer.




Source link

Fed-meeting-updates-Federal-Reserve-to-decide-on-interest-rate.jpeg

Fed meeting updates: Federal Reserve to decide on interest rate cut at final 2025 meeting

Fed leaders have kept monetary policy moderately restrictive in recent months, holding rates steady until September before introducing two quarter-point cuts.

Chair Jerome Powell said in the last meeting that a rate change in December is “not a foregone conclusion, far from it” and “policy is not on a preset course,” though on Wednesday morning, CME FedWatch is showing a roughly 90% chance of another quarter-point reduction.

Fed leaders have kept monetary policy moderately restrictive in recent months, holding rates steady until September before introducing two quarter-point cuts.

Chair Jerome Powell said in the last meeting that a rate change in December is “not a foregone conclusion, far from it” and “policy is not on a preset course,” though on Wednesday morning, CME FedWatch is showing a roughly 90% chance of another quarter-point reduction.

Investors and consumers are hopeful for more cuts. Americans could see more affordable mortgage, auto, and credit card rates in the new year, and businesses would be able to borrow money more easily — a move that could juice the sluggish job market.




Source link