Elon Musk is in a black suit jacket and a black graphic t-shirt on stage. He is looking to the top left corner of the image.

Elon Musk says Anthropic’s philosopher has no stake in the future because she doesn’t have kids. Here’s her response.


Marc Piasecki/Getty Images

  • Anthropic’s resident philosopher, Amanda Askell, helps shape Claude’s personality and morals.
  • Elon Musk said she’s not qualified because she doesn’t have kids and no stake in the future.
  • Askell had thoughts.

Anthropic famously employs a Scottish philosopher named Amanda Askell.

Her job is to imbue its chatbot, Claude, with a personality and a set of moral guardrails. She is essentially teaching it to be cool and good.

Elon Musk, however, doesn’t think she’s qualified.

“Those without children lack a stake in the future,” Musk posted on X in response to a profile of Askell published by The Wall Street Journal.

The Journal profile does not say whether Askell has kids. Musk, who has imbued his own chatbot, Grok, with a distinct personality, has 14 of them. Musk is known for promoting a brand of pronatalism that’s become popular among Silicon Valley elites.

Askell responded with her trademark dry intellectualism.

“I think it depends on how much you care about people in general vs. your own kin,” Askell wrote. “I do intend to have kids, but I still feel like I have a strong personal stake in the future because I care a lot about people thriving, even if they’re not related to me.”

“I think caring about your children can make you feel invested in the future in a new and very profound way, and I do understand people wanting to convey that,” she added.

The responses to their short back-and-forth were as varied as you might expect on Musk’s social media network. A day later, Askell posted again.

“I’m too right wing for the left and I’m too left wing for the right,” she said. “I’m too into humanities for those in tech and I’m too into tech for those in the humanities. What I’m learning is that failing to polarize is itself quite polarizing.”




Source link

Jamie Heller, incoming Editor-in-Chief

What’s the future of the software business look like? Our top tech columnist weighs in.

The future of software

Software stocks had a brutal week, aside from a Friday rally, extending what has been a rough year for the industry. I touched base with our tech columnist, Ali Barr, the best I know on AI business models. He also wrote this piece in the midst of the selloff.

Ali, you’ve been covering AI adoption and costs by big business since you started our Tech Memo newsletter. What’s your gut on whether the recent selloff was overblown?

Software business models have underpinned the tech industry for decades. Companies invest heavily upfront to build software, but each additional copy costs almost nothing to distribute. So revenue scales faster than costs, driving fat profit margins. That dynamic helps explain why Microsoft, the world’s largest software company, is so valuable.

AI challenges this model. If this new technology makes employees more productive, companies may need fewer software subscriptions. And as AI tools improve, businesses could replace existing software with AI-driven workflows or even build their own software using AI coding tools. Finally, if software companies embrace AI, that could make their services more expensive to run than traditional software. That would mean rising usage doesn’t automatically translate into soaring profitability.

If software in the AI era becomes less profitable and grows more slowly, then it’s logical that the stock prices of software companies might fall. A lot.

Big Tech spending on AI data centers and other infrastructure is set to soar again this year. How will these companies generate a return on these huge investments?

The numbers are breathtaking. Just two companies, Google and Amazon, are planning capex of almost $400 billion in 2026. A couple more years of the same, and that’s more than $1 trillion.

To get a return on this, they will have to come up with new revenue of well over $1 trillion in future years. AI is amazing and really useful, but it’s hard for some investors to see how this happens. Even if new AI products are awesome, do consumers and companies have enough money to buy all this stuff? I don’t know. One outcome could be that Big Tech giants make do with slimmer profit margins in an AI future. That’s similar to the concerns that have hammered software stocks lately.

Who are the most-interesting people to watch in the sector?

I pay attention to Andrej Karpathy. He was director of AI at Tesla and a founding member of OpenAI. He’s pretty independent nowadays, which means what he says about AI can be trusted more. Bonus: He coined the term “vibe coding.”

Aditya Agarwal was Facebook’s first head of product engineering. He was also CTO and VP of engineering at Dropbox. He’s a coding powerhouse. Recently, he used Claude to do some coding and was stunned by the power of this tool. “I am filled with wonder and also a profound sadness,” he wrote on X. “We will never ever write code by hand again. It doesn’t make any sense to do so. Something I was very good at is now free and abundant.”

I’m usually skeptical, but the start of 2026 feels like a moment of highly disruptive — and destructive — change.




Source link

Lauren Edmonds Profile Photo

Giannis Antetokounmpo invests in Kalshi, a day after fans traded over $23 million on his NBA future

While most of the sports world is still figuring out how to navigate the prediction market boom, NBA star Giannis Antetokounmpo is going all-in.

The Milwaukee Bucks player announced he’s a shareholder in Kalshi in an X post on Friday.

“The internet is full of opinions. I decided it was time to make some of my own,” Antetokounmpo wrote.

Kalshi said Antetokounmpo will partner with the company on marketing, live events, and other activities. Other shareholders include Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and Coinbase Ventures.

“I love the Kalshi markets and have been checking them often recently,” Antetokounmpo said in a press release. “I like to win. It’s clear to me Kalshi is going to be a winner, and I’m excited to be getting involved.”

Prediction markets are platforms where online users can buy and sell contracts based on the outcome of various events, including presidential elections, the weather, and even the political future of Venezuela’s Nicolás Maduro. Kalshi and Polymarket have emerged as popular platforms among users, who can make or lose large sums of money on all kinds of events unavailable in traditional gambling venues. The markets can often serve as measures of public opinion.


Screenshot from Kalshi

Kalshi users wagered on Giannis Antetokounmpo.



Kalshi



Some Kalshi users, for instance, got a payday earlier this week by wagering on Antetokounmpo’s future in the NBA.

Ahead of the league’s February 5 trade deadline, users speculated on whether Antetokounmpo would stay with the Milwaukee Bucks or retire from the league. Some also wagered on whether Milwaukee would trade Antetokounmpo to another team.

The contract amassed a trading volume of over $23 million.

Antetokounmpo, who ultimately remained with the Bucks, poked fun at the trade rumors in an X post on Thursday. “Legends don’t chase. They attract,” he wrote.

Following Antetokounmpo’s shareholder announcement, some fans expressed concern that he could be violating the NBA’s gambling policy and bemoaned the league’s recent embrace of sports gambling. The NBA now partners with FanDuel and displays betting odds during live broadcasts.

“A player partnering with a prediction market company? There is no conflict of interests here?” one X user asked.

A 2025 illegal sports gambling scandal involving Miami Heat player Terry Rozier and Portland Trail Blazers head coach Chauncey Billups highlighted the potential for players and coaches to influence games and betting outcomes. A federal investigation into the accusations is ongoing.

Kalshi said Antetokounmpo is prohibited from participating in its prediction markets.

“As an active player in the NBA, Antetokounmpo will be forbidden from trading on markets related to the NBA, per Kalshi’s strict terms of service that ban insider trading and market manipulation,” the company said in a press release.

Some US lawmakers have also raised concerns that prediction markets veer too closely to traditional gambling, which is subject to stricter regulations. In January, a lawmaker introduced a bill to ban government officials from engaging in insider trading in prediction markets.

Kalshi told Business Insider this month that the company has had “dozens of conversations” with lawmakers and is a “regulatory-first company.”




Source link

James Faris headshot

Bari Weiss fielded tough questions from CBS News staffers about political bias and the network’s future at a town hall

CBS News employees put top editor Bari Weiss in the hot seat during an all-hands meeting on Tuesday, asking about her vision and standards for the nearly century-old broadcast network.

The first question in the Q&A part of her town hall asked how she would respond to criticism that CBS News is turning into “a right-wing network” under her leadership.

“I’m here to do one thing. It’s not to be a mouthpiece for anybody. It’s simply to be a mouthpiece for fairness and the pursuit of truth,” Weiss said at the all-hands meeting, according to a recording obtained by Business Insider.

Weiss, who became the editor in chief of CBS News in October after Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison bought her opinion site The Free Press, asked staffers to examine the coverage since her appointment.

“There’s a lot of noise out there, but I would just urge anyone who suggests that to look at our work and judge for yourself,” she said.

Weiss was then asked how the network’s news-gathering standards had changed since she took over.

“I don’t think our standards have changed,” she said, adding that the network was “in very capable hands” regarding editorial standards.

Weiss said she ‘was not pressured’ to hold the ’60 Minutes’ segment

Weiss caused a stir in December for a late-hour decision to delay a “60 Minutes” segment about the Trump administration deporting migrants to the CECOT prison in El Salvador. Critics questioned her commitment to hard-hitting journalism and wondered whether Paramount leadership was influencing editorial decisions at CBS News — a notion that Weiss strongly denied on Tuesday.

“I want to just say this as plainly and clearly as possible. I was not pressured by David Ellison or anyone else,” Weiss said during the town hall. Weiss acknowledged that delaying the segment after commercials had already run for it was bad timing.

“I didn’t know the screening schedule for every single thing, that specific logistical nightmare,” she said. “That’s never going to happen again. So please rest assured that nothing of that kind is ever going to happen again. You have my promise.”

That said, she added that “asking for more information” and “trying to go back to a source” for a comment was an editorial policy she wanted to prioritize to build trust with audiences, as she explained in a December memo to employees.

“I felt it was important to do our best to try and get a voice from the administration, and I’m always going to be pushing for that,” Weiss said.

Weiss had little experience in traditional TV before joining CBS News. Instead, she became known in 2020 for her dramatic exit from The New York Times, during which she alleged anti-conservative bias. Her next move, starting The Free Press, turned out to be lucrative when Ellison bought it for $150 million in October.

‘Loving America is not about jingoism’

On Tuesday, Weiss was also asked about her core values, including what one of the new guiding principles for CBS Evening News — “We Love America” — means for journalists.

“Loving America is not about jingoism. It’s not about blind patriotism,” Weiss told employees. “It’s about vociferous defense of the principles and values that have made this country exceptional and that allow us to do the work that we do. And so anyone that disagrees with that, I’d love to have a conversation with you.”

When asked whether “CBS Mornings” would undergo another shake-up, Weiss noted that it had already undergone a major change, with longtime anchor Tony Dokoupil moving to the evening show.

“Speculation about Gayle King seems to be a favorite parlor game of a lot of newspapers and people in this building, and I just want everyone here to know that she’s absolutely beloved and see her long into the future here at CBS,” Weiss said.

A shift to a ‘streaming mentality’

In prepared remarks, Weiss said that CBS News needed to “shift to a streaming mentality immediately” and that if the broadcast network stuck mainly to its linear TV strategy, “we’re toast.”

When asked about staffing or potential layoffs at CBS News, Weiss said that she couldn’t make any promises amid a “tsunami of technological change.”

“I can’t stand up here and tell you that in a moment of incredible transformation that that’s not going to mean transformation of our workforce,” Weiss said. She added that CBS News is “also hiring people to suit that.”

On Tuesday, CBS News announced 19 new contributors to the network, including writers and podcasters like Coleman Hughes and Derek Thompson.

Weiss said that if she didn’t believe digital revenue could eventually replace linear TV revenue, she “wouldn’t be standing here.” She said that linear TV wouldn’t go away, but that revenue would “decline sharply, as will the audience.”

“What winning looks like writ large for this company is building incredible journalism for audiences that are so much bigger than the one that we currently have and are maintaining on linear,” Weiss said. “That’s what winning looks like. It’s really simple.”

Have a tip or thoughts on Bari Weiss’ strategy for CBS News? Contact this reporter via email at jfaris@businessinsider.com or Signal at @jamesfaris.01. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.




Source link

Expedia-says-its-cutting-some-roles-as-it-assesses-skills.jpeg

Expedia says it’s cutting some roles as it assesses skills needed for the future and simplifies its structure

  • Expedia is cutting jobs, the company confirmed to Business Insider.
  • Expedia said it’s focusing on skills needed for the future and simplifying its structure.
  • The scope of the cuts was unclear, but several affected employees posted about it on LinkedIn.

Expedia is cutting some roles as it looks toward the skills needed for the future, the company confirmed to Business Insider on Monday.

“We are eliminating roles as well as opening some new roles as we remain disciplined about assessing the skills we need for the future,” an Expedia Group spokesperson said in a statement. “We are also simplifying our structure and reducing organizational layers to move faster and with more accountability. These are not easy decisions, and we are grateful for the contributions of our colleagues who are impacted.”

It’s unclear how many people were affected or which divisions the cuts occurred in.

Several Expedia employees posted about being laid off on LinkedIn on Monday.

“After a decade of proudly working at Expedia, my role has been impacted due to organizational changes,” Natasha Morosov Pereira, an operations improvement manager, wrote, adding, “While this transition wasn’t expected, I’m grateful for everything I’ve learned and optimistic about what’s ahead.”

Also on Monday, over a dozen Expedia employees shared the same message on LinkedIn promoting openings at the travel booking company: “Expedia Group currently has OVER 250 roles open! Let’s transform travel together.”

Expedia joins several other companies that have cut roles in 2026, including Citi and T-Mobile.

Like Expedia, many companies cutting roles this year and last have cited an effort to flatten organizational structures and move faster in order to prepare for the future.

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at kvlamis@businessinsider.com or Signal at @kelseyv.21. Use a personal email address, a nonwork WiFi network, and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.




Source link