Strong-is-the-new-skinny-Women-leaders-are-strength-training.jpeg

‘Strong is the new skinny’: Women leaders are strength training to thrive at work

When Deb Stern steps up to the barbell for a heavy back squat, all distractions fall away.

When you’re sweating under cold steel, there’s no room for stray thoughts. Stresses about her busy caseload as an attorney, her packed schedule as a mom of two, and the hustle of New York City living are eclipsed by the more than 100 pounds of metal she’s about to lift.

It’s not easy — everything in her mind and body is alert to the challenge, the possibility of failure. She hoists the weight onto her shoulders, the ends of the barbell dipping under massive plates, and she squats, driving through her legs and core to propel the equivalent of a young hippopotamus down and back up, repeatedly.


Deb Stern

Attorney Deb Stern loves heavy barbell back squats, and said weightlifting keeps her calm and centered even with a busy caseload. 

Sydney Krantz for BI



After her workouts, Stern said, everything else in her life feels easier. She’s done the hard thing, trained herself to face down uncertainty and discomfort, and came out stronger.

Outside the gym, Stern is a structured finance lawyer, a specialist in navigating the complex legal framework behind massive piles of cash in loans and investments. It’s a high-stakes environment that demands performance every time Stern calls a client or leads a team on a new project. And after a good gym session, she’s not only up to the challenge, but embraces it head-on.

“It happens at work every day. Before weight training, I would have been super stressed out,” Stern told Business Insider. “Now, no matter what gets thrown at me, I can handle it. Bring it on.”


Deb Stern

Building strength in the gym translates into better resilience and the ability to handle real-world stresses, such as leadership roles at work. 

Sydney Krantz for BI



It’s not just the endorphins of exercise (though that helps). In an era defined by GLP-1 drugs promising to shed pounds, many women in business and tech are increasingly turning toward gains instead to project an image of competence, drive, and self-mastery. For these women, lifting weights is a way to signal ambition and confidence, and to showcase their discipline. And women aren’t lifting alone — gyms have turned workouts into a social ritual, moving networking from happy hour to the gym floor.

“I think strong is the new skinny, and that’s why we keep seeing it with young women changing their body image through strength training,” Jim Rowley, CEO of Crunch Fitness, told Business Insider.

With interest climbing, gyms and studios are downsizing their cardio equipment to make way for the weights. For instance, Gold’s Gym has decreased its cardio space by about 15%, according to the director of performance Erin Gregory. At the same time, they’ve added 30% more strength training equipment, like more squat racks, benches, and free weights.

“Women are getting more confidence on the weight room floor, which I love to see,” Gregory told Business Insider.

Beyond sculpted biceps or heavy squats, strength training is also part of a broader antiaging movement that finally acknowledges that healthy muscle mass is a key factor in living a longer, healthier life.


Deb Stern

Kettlebells, barbells, dumbbells, and exercise machines are among the options for women looking to get strong. 

Sydney Krantz for BI



And ambitious women in the workplace told Business Insider that pumping iron helps build the mental strength needed to climb an ever-steeper corporate ladder.

The right to bare arms

In an era where longevity is the ultimate status symbol, it’s hard to beat strength training. Showing off a sculpted, muscular physique signals resilience for the long haul.

A growing body of research suggests that working out, particularly with resistance training, is one of the most effective anti-aging tools we have. Women are increasingly the focus of that research after decades of being assumed to be smaller, less muscular versions of men.

“Once they actually started to study the impacts of strength training on women, the evidence supporting women’s strength training was just unbelievable,” said personal trainer Kristie Larson.


Deb Stern

Weight lifting has a myriad of benefits for women, from stronger bones to increased energy and improved mood. 

Sydney Krantz for BI


“Now women are understanding, if I want to be independent into old age, then it’s really important for me to start thinking about my bone health and building muscle mass instead of the narrative that we were constantly exposed to of just working out to be skinny.”

Women’s prestige was once tied to staying small, maintaining a petite figure and tiny waist as evidence that we could have it all: a career, 90 minutes or more of cardio a day, and the ability to subsist on salads and smiles.

Former Wall Street Journal reporter Anne Marie Chaker said she vividly recalls, as a rookie journalist, stepping into the office elevator with an editor who tried to compliment her by asking if she had lost weight.

Enter Ozempic.


Anne Marie Chaker

Anne Marie Chaker started strength training in 2017. She details the benefits in her book “Lift: How Women Can Reclaim Their Physical Power and Transform Their Lives.” 

Stella Kalinina for BI



Over the past five years, prescription weight loss medications have taken the world by storm, with about 1 in every 8 American adults trying them. While GLP-1s are by no means a shortcut to weight loss or health, the drugs have offered an unprecedented means to change one’s body far beyond what diet or supplements can consistently do alone. As the drugs have become more affordable, they’re also reshaping access to long-term weight loss support.

But you can’t buy muscle — yet. It takes hours of sweat and months of consistency to build an athletic body. As a result, showing off a muscular physique has become a status symbol boasting discipline.

Training became a corporate cheat code

More than ever, women are leveraging their physical strength to signal not only their dedication, but their capacity for leadership, said Pattie Sellers, a former assistant managing editor at Fortune.

For two decades, Sellers chaired the magazine’s running list of the world’s most powerful women, who often showed up in historically male-dominated fields like business and tech. In a bygone era, men in charge would broker deals over scotch and cigars, or lavish dinners on the company’s dime.


Anne Marie Chaker

Sculpted arms have become a status symbol for women. 

Stella Kalinina for BI



That won’t cut it in today’s high-stress environment, where the job requires real stamina, the kind of mental and physical resilience that can’t be faked.

“It’s not just optics,” Sellers said. “You’re simply not going to last if you are not strong physically, mentally, emotionally. It is too much of a pressure cooker world for leaders to survive, no matter your industry, unless you’re focusing on health and wellness.”

For women like Sarah Robb-O’Hagan, a lifelong athlete whose résumé spans Equinox and Nike, strength training was a major source of support at key moments throughout her career, including after the birth of her second child.

She said those hours in the gym have paid dividends in terms of energy, focus, and confidence at the office.

“Even if I didn’t feel like getting up and going to the gym, I knew that by the time I came home, it would give me that empowerment for the rest of the day,” she said. “Having a strong body equates to a strong mind, equates to me being able to handle the big life that I want to have.”


Anne Marie Chaker

Women can, and should, lift heavy.  

Stella Kalinina for BI


Fitting exercise into your day also highlights effective time management and multitasking skills. Chaker said it’s a non-negotiable for her, even when she has to bring her laptop to the gym and take calls or answer emails between sets. She’s seen other women do the same.

“It is a flex to show that this is something you prioritize. You can get it all done, and you can be strong and kick ass,” Chaker said.

For women, hitting the weights is an opportunity to own the room, take up space at the table literally and metaphorically, said Robb-O’Hagan. As a result, we’ve seen a new era of execs focused on presenting their physiques as symbols of discipline and rigor, taking up jiu-jitsu, adopting high-protein diets, and practicing intermittent fasting.

“What you can do physically is such a wonderful metaphor for what you can do mentally and emotionally as a leader in the workplace,” she told Business Insider. “Because ultimately strength training is about self-efficacy, and that’s really what leadership is about as well.”

Happy hour at the barbell

Late last year, Chaker had the networking opportunity of a lifetime. At a women’s leadership conference in Montana, Chaker ran into a top businesswoman — she wouldn’t name-drop out of respect for her privacy, but she’s one of the fewer than 500 women billionaires on the planet.

It all started when she asked to borrow Chaker’s resistance band during a chance meeting in the hotel gym. The impromptu one-on-one chat offered a more memorable moment of connection than any keynote speech or skill-sharing lunch, she recalled.

“Lifting is a great equalizer,” Chaker said.


Anne Marie Chaker

Strength training doesn’t need to be complicated to be effective. A simple set of dumbbells is enough to build muscle and strength.  

Stella Kalinina for BI


For Chaker, who became a bodybuilder in her 40s, lifting not only provides her with unique and intimate networking opportunities but also benefits her career.

“When I started lifting, everything in my life changed. I got a raise at work. I was interviewing better. My story ideas got better,” Chaker said. “And it wasn’t just because of cool muscles. It was because it changed my view of how I took up space in the world.”

Women aren’t pumping iron in isolation. Boutique fitness, revitalized post-pandemic, has made health an elevated and social event, prompting business leaders to move happy hour from the bar to the barbell.


Deb stern and her trainer

Beyond the physical gains, lifting weights builds confidence and the ability to take up space and rise to a challenge, crucial assets for leadership roles. 

Sydney Krantz for BI



But even as more women are interested in the weight room, it can still retain an air of gymtimidation. For savvy fitness pros, that’s created a prime audience for women-centered strength spaces, according to Larson.

Larson opened her own gym, Tension Strength, in Brooklyn after years of coaching for Row House and other studios. She noticed a demographic of high-achieving women who wanted to level up their exercise beyond cardio and Pilates, but weren’t sure where to start.

Strength training, by its nature, requires failure in order to grow. That translates well to an executive mindset, taking on challenges and setbacks to build back better, and gives women in particular a space to practice this skill without judgment.

“We’re a lot more conditioned to see men trying and failing, iterating, whereas with women, there’s this expectation that we succeed the first time or we disappear,” Larson said. “In strength training, confidence translates into all different areas of life because you understand it’s safe to try.”


Photos of the winners of Ms. Olympia, female bodybuilding's most prestigious competition, from 1980 to early 2000s adorn one of the walls at Gold's Gym in Venice, California

Weightlifting isn’t a new phenomenon for women, but it’s more popular than ever before, according to trainers. 

Stella Kalinina for BI



Sellers, the former Fortune editor, also sees women’s fitness as a means to match the close-knit, exclusive clubs that powerful men have enjoyed for decades. In 1996, just one executive on the Fortune 500 was a woman. Today, they make up 10% — still a long way to go. Sellers hopes that connections built at the gyms could help close the gap.

“We are working really hard to create the female version of the golf course,” Sellers said.




Source link

Headshot of Chris Panella.

US Army leaders say soldiers are drowning in so much battlefield data that AI is needed to make sense of it all

Army leaders say the modern battlefield is so saturated with sensors and networked weapons generating more data than soldiers can realistically process on their own that artificial intelligence is needed to meaningfully sort it all.

For years, the Army’s focus was on fielding more sensors for battlefield information and awareness, but now the service is also having to think about information overload and managing the massive amounts of data coming in.

During a recent US Army and NATO exercise in Europe, troops used a homegrown AI system to consume and sort data. The value wasn’t strictly that the AI could do it faster but rather that it could remember context and patterns that humans couldn’t.

The case from the Dynamic Front exercise is another example of how the US military is increasingly implementing AI and automation into everything from enemy attack simulations to paperwork.

“The modern battlefield, what we’re already seeing across the globe, it is swimming in sensors, and we are drowning in data,” Col. Jeff Pickler, the Army 2nd Multi-Domain Task Force commander, said at a media roundtable on Dynamic Front.

There aren’t enough people to decipher all the available information, he said. “They will never be able to fully process all of that.”


Two soldiers stand near an artillery piece about to fire in a wintry landscape.

This year’s Dynamic Front included almost 2,000 US personnel and almost 4,000 personnel from allies and partners.

US Army photo by Kevin Sterling Payne



The software aimed at addressing that problem remains in beta testing. In the next iteration of Dynamic Front — which will merge with another exercise, Arcane Front, to pair technology experimentation with theater-level combat rehearsals — Army leaders say they intend to test the AI at a larger scale.

“If we’re looking at a target set in the European theater where we think we’re going to need to process upwards of 1,500 targets a day, that’s beyond the human scope,” Pickler said. “The answer to the equation there is in AI and automations.”

During a potential large-scale conflict in Europe, AI could assist in locating and assessing those targets.

The system can do this quickly, but the speed isn’t the main benefit. AI can remember patterns that humans might forget or not even notice. Pickler gave an example of AI realizing that unrelated shipping reports, a local power outage, and a fertilizer delivery together might suggest missile fueling activity.

“So the difference isn’t seconds versus minutes — it’s minutes instead of months. Not because the machine scans quickly, but because it keeps context across sources that humans can’t hold in memory,” Pickler said after the roundtable.

“It doesn’t replace analysts by reading faster,” he said, “it replaces the weeks analysts spend reconnecting information spread across thousands of reports.”


Two soldiers sit at a table working on laptops.

AI, autonomy, and machine learning are at the forefront of the Army’s modernization efforts.

US Army photo by Capt. Regina Koesters



In a conflict scenario, that could mean analysts reach a clearer picture of the battlefield faster. Correlations between data gathered from different sensors could surface more quickly. If an adversary were fueling, arming, or moving weapons in ways that were not immediately obvious, AI could help flag those links.

Humans, though, would still decide how to respond.

Soldiers have seen success with iterating on the current AI model, the Army said. It’s been retooled during testing, and humans remain in the loop, reviewing outputs at multiple stages.

The goal is to continue increasing the overlap the model would have with human-produced information. In a targeting example, a milestone would be if AI achieved 90 to 95% agreement with humans on 100 target sets.

The Army’s push for AI and automation is also driving the development of its Next Generation Command and Control software, a priority initiative.

The technology being developed by vendor teams including Anduril, Palantir, and Lockheed Martin uses AI and machine learning to provide commanders and soldiers with real-time data on ammunition levels, maintenance needs, intelligence feeds, targeting, and simulated enemy attacks.

But AI is also changing other aspects of how the Army works. Autonomous features in drones, weapons, and targeting might be at the forefront, but behind the scenes, personnel are using new tools, redesigned workflows, and data integration for recruiting, maintenance, and inventors. These are manual tasks that the service believes can be improved with AI.




Source link

Tech-leaders-are-raising-tough-questions-over-Matt-Shumers-viral.jpeg

Tech leaders are raising tough questions over Matt Shumer’s viral essay on how AI will impact jobs.

Scientists and business leaders are responding to a viral essay warning of AI’s impact on jobs with a mix of agreement and skepticism.

The essay, titled “Something Big is Coming,” written by cofounder and CEO of OthersideAI, Matt Shumer, has racked up more than 60 million views on X as of Thursday.

In the 5,000-word post, Shumer said that AI could upend daily life on a scale “much bigger” than COVID, a comparison which drew pushback online. He wrote that the changes already unfolding in the tech sector are likely a preview of disruptions that could soon reach other industries as well.

“Even if there is a 20% chance of this happening, people deserve to know and have time to prepare,” Shumer told Business Insider’s Brent Griffiths in an interview.

Here’s what some of the sharpest minds in AI are saying about Shumer’s essay.

David Haber

Haber, a general partner at venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz specializing in technology investments, posted on X that Shumer’s essay contains “great advice for how to get ahead in your job at any large company right now.”

“‘I used AI to do this analysis in an hour instead of three days is going to be the most valuable person in the room.’ Not eventually. Right now,” Haber quotes from the essay. “Learn these tools. Get proficient. Demonstrate what’s possible.”

Alexis Ohanian

The Reddit founder responded to Shumer’s initial post on X with a simple comment: “Great writeup. Strongly agree.”

Since 2023, Reddit has introduced a range of AI-driven tools, from search features that summarize user discussions to AI that sharpens its content recommendations and targets ads, but Ohanian recently emphasized that the platform must retain its humanity to stay competitive.

Eric Markowitz

Markowitz, the author and managing partner and director of research at Nightview Capital, a long-term-oriented investment firm, responded to Schumer with an essay almost as long, which criticized the practice of chasing speed and replacing the value of humanity simply because it could be done.

“These two worlds — Wall Street and Silicon Valley — have formed a feedback loop of short-termism so tight, so self-reinforcing, that they’ve confused efficiency with purpose, growth with meaning, and the elimination of people with progress,” wrote Markowitz.

“I have two research assistants. Could I replace them with AI? Of course. But their value extends their weekly output,” Markowitz added. “They give meaning to my work and I love seeing the excitement in their faces when they make a new discovery that I, alone, could not have found.”

“Let me say it again: we are not our tools. We never have been,” Markowitz wrote in conclusion.

Todd McLees

McLees, the founder of HumanSkills.AI, wrote on X that Shumer is not wrong, but he said that the advice Shumer provided is akin to “telling someone the floodwaters are rising and handing them a better bucket.”

“As AI grows in ability, our role in defining direction, values, and purpose only becomes more essential,” McLees said.

“What do you bring when the machine can do the work? That’s the only question that matters when intelligence is abundant,” McLees added. “Shumer wrote the alarm. It’s a good one. But alarms don’t tell you where to go. You have to find that within yourself.”

Gary Marcus

Marcus, Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Neural Science at NYU and founder of AI companies Robust.AI, has some harsh words for Schumer in his newsletter.

Marcuz called Shumer’s blog post “weaponized hype, filled with vivid narrative and marketing speech,” and said he did not provide real data to support the claim that the latest AI can write complicated apps without mistakes.

“Shumer’s presentation is completely one-sided, omitting lots of concerns that have been widely expressed here and elsewhere,” Marcus added, after discussing various studies that question the accuracy and productivity gain AI tools actually provide.

Vishal Misra

Misra, Vice Dean of Computing and Artificial Intelligence at Columbia University, responded in a lengthy Substack article that detailed why he doesn’t think AI is as scary as it sounds, at least not right now.

Misra wrote that many strange AI behaviors that make them seem sentient, such as perceived resistance and self-preservation, are simply a result of training data.

As for the possible elimination of jobs, Misra said he understands the anxiety, but history says we may not need to panic.

“When the camera was invented, portrait painters had every reason to panic. Their livelihood depended on a skill that a machine could now approximate,” Misra wrote.

“What happened? Painters didn’t disappear. They were freed from the obligation to faithfully reproduce reality and ventured into impressionism, cubism, abstract expressionism,” Misra added. “The camera didn’t kill painting. It liberated it.”




Source link

Ashley Stewart Business Insider

Salesforce is replacing 5 high-profile leaders who have left since December with 6 new execs

  • Salesforce has appointed new leaders in an executive shake-up.
  • Six new hires and promoted executives will lead businesses like Agentforce and Slack.
  • The executives replace five high-profile leaders who have announced departures since December.

Salesforce has hired or promoted six new leaders, replacing five high-profile leaders who have announced departures from the company since December, according to a person familiar with the changes.

  • Iain Mulholland is the company’s new chief security officer, joining from Google. Mulholland most recently worked as the deputy chief information security officer for Google Cloud and Technical Infrastructure. He replaces Brad Arkin, who left Salesforce at the end of January after serving for just over two years.
  • Patrick Stokes, a longtime Salesforce executive, is the company’s new chief marketing officer. Stokes replaces Ariel Kelman, who left on Monday to join chipmaker AMD.
  • Dave Ward is Salesforce’s new chief architect. He joined from Lumen Technologies, where he was chief technology officer.
  • Joe Inzerillo, the company’s chief digital officer, is now president of enterprise and AI technology, overseeing both Slack and Agentforce. Agentforce has become one of Salesforce’s most important new AI services. CEO Marc Benioff has even suggested he might rename the company after Agentforce.
  • Salesforce promoted executives Rob Seaman, now executive vice president and general manager for Slack, and Madhav Thattai, executive vice president and general manager for Agentforce.

“Salesforce has always been a talent engine,” a Salesforce spokesperson said in a statement. “Our deep bench and proactive succession planning ensure that our strategy is institutionalized, not individualized. We’re confident in the leaders stepping into these roles and are excited for what’s ahead in FY27.”

Salesforce’s new fiscal year started on February 1. Some of the changes are yet to be announced widely internally.

Besides Arkin and Kelman, other high-profile executives have left Salesforce recently. The previous head of Agentforce, Adam Evans, announced his departure on Sunday.

“I’ve decided it’s time to start my next chapter outside Salesforce – returning to what I love most: building startups,” Evans wrote in a LinkedIn post. Evans spoke to Business Insider late last year for a story on Agentforce’s challenges.

Ryan Aytay, CEO of Salesforce’s Tableau business, announced his departure last week, and Slack CEO Denise Dresser departed in December to become OpenAI’s chief revenue officer.

Salesforce stock has been taking a beating among other software companies as investors fear competition from AI companies.

Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at astewart@businessinsider.com or Signal at +1-425-344-8242. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here’s our guide to sharing information securely.




Source link

Bill Ackman, Jeff Dean, and Jason Calacanis composite image

‘Absolutely shameful’: Business and tech leaders react to the latest fatal ICE shooting

Business leaders spoke about federal immigration officers’ latest fatal shooting over the weekend.

  • Federal immigration officers shot and killed Alex Pretti, 37, in Minneapolis on Saturday.
  • The killing elicited sharp reactions from Americans, including business and tech leaders.
  • Google DeepMind’s chief scientist said it was “absolutely shameful.”

After a second fatality in confrontations with immigration officers in Minnesota on Saturday, business leaders took to social media to have their say.

Eric Horvitz
Microsoft's chief scientific officer, Eric Horvitz, poses against a window.
Microsoft’s chief scientific officer Eric Horvitz.

Microsoft’s chief scientific officer posted a screenshot of a statement from Alex Pretti’s parents with the caption “Anguish and pursuit of truth” on X on Sunday.

Horvitz also wrote on X, “Values, service, and character,” in response to a video posted by CBS News of Pretti reading a final salute to a veteran.

Yann LeCun
Former Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun talks to an audience and stands against a black background.
Former Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun

Former Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun replied “Murderers” to footage of the shooting circulating on Saturday. He has since reposted anti-ICE tweets and pushed back against users who criticize his stance.

LeCun has regularly shared posts critical of the Trump administration on social media.

Paul Graham
Paul Graham is pictured in conversation with Charlie Rose.
Almost a year out from his viral essay, Paul Graham reflected on the difference between going “founder mode” and micromanaging.

Paul Graham, cofounder of startup accelerator Y Combinator, wrote in a post on X on Saturday: “If someone had predicted before the last election that if Trump won, federal officers would be shooting Americans in the streets, he’d have been dismissed as an alarmist.”

Chris Olah

Anthropic cofounder Chris Olah wrote on X that he typically doesn’t comment on politics, but recent events “shock the conscience.”

“My deep loyalty is to the principles of classical liberal democracy: freedom of speech, the rule of law, the dignity of the human person. I immigrated to the United States — and eventually cofounded Anthropic here — believing it was a pillar of these principles,” he wrote, adding: “I feel very sad today.”

CEOs of major Minnesota-based companies
A woman walksi n front of a Target store

The Minnesota Chamber of Commerce distributed a letter on Sunday signed by more than 60 CEOs of Minnesota-based companies, including professional sports teams.

Among the signatories were Target CEO Michael Fiddelke, 3M CEO William Brown, Allianz Life Insurance Company CEO Jasmine Jirele, Cargill CEO Brian Sikes, General Mills CEO Jeff Harmening, and UnitedHealth Group CEO Stephen Hemsley, among many others.

The letter called for an “immediate de-escalation of tensions” and for state, local, and federal officials to “work together to find real solutions.”

“In this difficult moment for our community, we call for peace and focused cooperation among local, state, and federal leaders to achieve a swift and durable solution that enables families, businesses, our employees, and communities across Minnesota to resume our work to build a bright and prosperous future,” the letter says.

Khosla Ventures partners disagree

The shooting divided leaders even within the same VC firm. Khosla Ventures’ Keith Rabois posted on X “no law enforcement has shot an innocent person. illegals are committing violent crimes everyday.” Rabois is a self-proclaimed contrarian whose political opinions have courted controversy in recent years.

Two colleagues — Ethan Choi and Vinod Khosla — disagreed with Rabois on X. Khosla described the video of Pretti’s death as “macho ICE vigilantes running amuck empowered by a conscious-less administration.”

Choi said Rabois’ post did not represent the VC firm’s view. “What happened in Minnesota is plain wrong. Don’t know how you could really see it differently. Sad to see a person’s life taken unnecessarily,” Choi wrote.

Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman.

The hedge-fund billionaire, who supported Trump in the 2024 election, called for calm in an X post on Saturday. Ackman said that the United States had reached a point where “there are only two sides to every issue and every incident.”

“Individuals are ‘convicted’ of serious crimes in the headlines, by politicians appealing to their base, and ultimately in the minds of the public, or they are exonerated, before all of the facts are in and a detailed investigation has been completed,” he wrote. “This is not good for America.”

Two hours later, in another post on X, Ackman laid the blame on Minnesota’s governor, Tim Walz.

“It is almost as if the governor of Minnesota called for protesters to intervene in ICE enforcements in an incendiary manner,” he said, tagging Walz. “Inciting the people to rise up against law enforcement is guaranteed to end badly, and now we have seen the tragic consequences.”

Ackman later donated $10,000 to a GoFundMe set up for Pretti’s family after being asked to do so in a post on X by Shannon Watts, the founder of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.

Ackman wrote in a reply on X: “Done. That said, I don’t agree with the gofundme that he is an American hero, but his loss is tragic for him and his family.”

Reid Hoffman
Reid Hoffman at a conference with mic in hand

Like Ackman, billionaire LinkedIn cofounder Reid Hoffman is perpetually online, posting frequently on social media. The Democratic donor has been largely quiet this weekend, though he has reposted comments from other people, including one that called ICE “out of control.”

In another post that Hoffman amplified, an X user called out “chronically online tech leaders” for suddenly falling quiet. Another X user called on business and tech leaders to use their platform to stand up to the Trump administration and its immigration enforcement tactics, to which Hoffman replied, “It’s time for all Americans to do so.”

James Dyett

James Dyett, the head of global business at OpenAI, called on leaders in the tech and business communities to use their influence to criticize the Trump administration’s immigration policies.

“There is far more outrage from tech leaders over a wealth tax than masked ICE agents terrorizing communities and executing civilians in the streets,” Dyer wrote on X. “Tells you what you need to know about the values of our industry.”

Jeff Dean
Jeff Dean stands in front of Google logo

Jeff Dean, Google DeepMind’s chief scientist, wrote in response to a video of the shooting circulating on X: “This is absolutely shameful.”

“Agents of a federal agency unnecessarily escalating, and then executing a defenseless citizen whose offense appears to be using his cellphone camera,” he wrote. “Every person, regardless of political affiliation, should be denouncing this.”

Minneapolis police confirmed that Alex Pretti, who was filming federal agents when they wrestled him to the ground, was legally carrying a gun.

Border Patrol officials said Pretti had threatened them with the gun, but multiple videos of the incident show that agents had already disarmed and subdued Pretti when he was shot.

Jason Calacanis
Jason Calacanis in black tie

Jason Calacanis, a prominent investor and entrepreneur who is these days perhaps most known as one of the hosts of the popular “All-In” podcast, blamed the country’s political leaders in a post on X on Sunday.

“Once again, I will remind everyone that our leaders are failing us,” he wrote. “True leadership would be to calm this situation down by telling these non-peaceful protesters to stay home while recalling these inadequately-trained agents.”

He later posted that “all of this violence” could be avoided by fining businesses that hire immigrants who are not in the country legally.

Ray Dalio
Hedge fund manager Ray Dalio speaks at an event.

Billionaire investor Ray Dalio posted an X article on Monday, reflecting on a book he’d recently written. Current events made Dalio feel like he was “watching a movie that I have seen many times in history,” he wrote.

Minneapolis exhibited signs of stages five and six of his “Big Cycle,” he wrote: the pre-breakdown and breakdown of existing orders.

“The United States is now a tinderbox,” Dalio wrote. “The world saw the killings in Minneapolis of two opponents to Trump’s ICE initiative and is now watching to see which side will back down.”

Garry Tan
Garry Tan is pictured at the 2022 Web Summit
Gary Tan said that some academic entrepreneurship programs are creating “fake” founders like Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried.

Garry Tan, the CEO of startup accelerator Y Combinator, said in a post on X that the “Minneapolis tragedy is truly sad,” and that he wanted “order and peace.”

The YC CEO, who had faced some criticism for posting about coding in recent days, wrote that he was staying focused on San Francisco, where he has a strong political presence.

“Remind yourself politics is local not national,” he wrote. “I’m going to keep fighting for my city.”

Caitlin Kalinowski

OpenAI’s robotics head, Caitlin Kalinowski, responded on X, citing the Constitution.

The OpenAI staffer referenced the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, and 14th amendments, which include the right to protest and assembly, the right to bear arms, and the right to due process under the law.

Before working at OpenAI, Kalinowski was Meta’s head of AR Glasses Hardware.

David Marcus

David Marcus, cofounder and CEO of crypto payments company Lightspark, wrote on X in response to the incident: “The number of people who can hold two thoughts at the same time is dwindling at a dangerous rate.”

“It’s not because these anti-ICE protests are mostly inorganic and designed to generate this chaos, or that protesters show up with loaded guns that you can’t also be totally appalled by citizens being shot dead on our streets,” added Marcus, who is also a former president of PayPal.

“Let’s just remember we’re all Americans for a second.”

Cristina Cordova

Cristina Cordova, the chief operating officer at Linear, a product management software company, called the incident “indefensible” in a post on X.

“The victim’s legally owned handgun was removed from the scene, and then ICE agents shot him multiple times. It’s far from law enforcement — it’s just murder,” she wrote.

“Those who defend this don’t care about law or order. It’s about money, power, and protecting an executive branch that’s already been bought and paid for.”

Kath Korevec

Kath Korevec, the director of product at Google Labs, has called on X users to support their local immigration organizations.

“I can’t go to Minneapolis. And it’s only a matter of time before they show up in force here in the Bay Area. So here’s what I’m doing to help my neighbors prepare,” Korevec wrote in a post on X on Sunday.

She said in the post that she is researching, donating, and offering help to organizations that support immigrants.

Korevec said that she is calling her “congressmen and women and asking them not to approve ICE funding without major reform to how the organization is run.”

“And I’m paying attention. Not looking away, even when it’s hard,” she added. “If you’re able to do any of this where you live, now is the time.”

Josh Miller

Josh Miller, the cofounder and CEO of The Browser Company, wrote on X that he has been hesitant to speak on politics — but that this moment was no longer political.

“It is about something more fundamental,” he wrote. “It is about what America stands for. Call it morals, call it decency, whatever word resonates most with you.”

Miller wrote that the government “executed a man,” and that he was “deeply sad for his parents.”

Before The Browser Company, Miller sold his startup, Branch, to Facebook. He then left Facebook for the federal government, becoming the White House’s first director of product under former President Barack Obama.

Google DeepMind’s Dean thanked Miller for speaking up. Miller responded: “10 shots in the back of an American citizen who worked as an ICU nurse at the veterans hospital in town. While they knew they were being filmed in broad daylight. And our Secretary of War cheers them on from Twitter. Something is not right.”

Read the original article on Business Insider

Source link

Live-updates-Davos-2026-begins-business-and-world-leaders-arrive.jpeg

Live updates: Davos 2026 begins, business and world leaders arrive

Flying commercial isn’t always the best option for Davos attendees, and many are arriving by private jet.

Marc Benioff’s Gulfstream G700 is one of the latest jets to touch down near the alpine resort.

Flying commercial isn’t always the best option for Davos attendees, and many are arriving by private jet.

Marc Benioff’s Gulfstream G700 is one of the latest jets to touch down near the alpine resort.

The Salesforce CEO’s plane flew over 14 hours from Hawaii to Friedrichshafen, Germany, according to data from JetSpy. It touched down shortly after 11 a.m. local time on Monday

It’s perhaps the swankiest jet to arrive so far. The price tag for a G700 starts at $78 million.

Benioff is scheduled to speak tomorrow.

Two BlackRock-owned Gulfstream G650 jets have landed in Zurich, too, per JetSpy’s tracking data.

One of them arrived on Sunday morning, followed by the other about 25 hours later. They both came from New York’s Westchester County Airport.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is also the interim co-chair of the WEF. He’s due to speak tomorrow morning.

Corporate jets owned by Google, IBM, The Carlyle Group, and Eli Lilly have also landed in the region since Saturday, per JetSpy.

Airspace restrictions mean very few will land at the airport closest to Davos. Instead, most are arriving in Zurich, and some at Friedrichshafen. The German town is about 60 miles from Davos as the crow flies.




Source link

Business-leaders-from-Palmer-Luckey-to-David-Sacks-react-to.jpeg

Business leaders from Palmer Luckey to David Sacks react to California’s proposed billionaire tax

  • Bill Ackman, Palmer Luckey, Garry Tan, and more are sharing their opinions on a California wealth tax proposal.
  • State labor groups proposed a 5% tax for California residents whose assets exceed $1 billion.
  • Ackman called for a “fairer tax system”; Tan wrote that he would consider opening Y Combinator programs in other cities.

Some of the biggest names in business are speaking up about California’s billionaire tax proposal.

The measure proposed a one-time 5% tax for California residents whose assets exceed $1 billion. If the proposal receives enough signatures, it would appear on the state ballot in November.

If the proposal passes, the tax would apply retroactively to all California residents as of January 1, 2026.

Proposed by the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West labor union, the bill attempts to fill a projected multibillion-dollar state budget deficit.

California is home to some of the biggest companies — in both value and prestige — in the US. The state boasts Hollywood and Silicon Valley, although some of the industries’ key players have relocated.

In a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom obtained by Business Insider, attorney Alex Spiro wrote that his clients would “permanently relocate” if the tax becomes law. Spiro has previously represented billionaires and celebrities.

Here’s how several business leaders and politicians have reacted to the tax proposal:

Bill Ackman

Bill Ackman wrote in favor of a “fairer tax system,” but not a wealth tax.

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

The billionaire CEO of Pershing Square Holdings wrote Monday on X that he was “opposed to wealth taxes because they effectively represent an expropriation of private property,” which can have “unintended and negative consequences.”

However, he said he’s in favor of a “fairer tax system.”

For example, Ackman wrote that an individual who had amassed a billion dollars or more in wealth could pay no personal income tax by living off loans secured by stock in their company. A change in the tax code could fix that problem, he wrote.

“One shouldn’t be able to live and spend like a billionaire and pay no tax,” Ackman wrote.

As for California’s “budget problems,” Ackman wrote that the issue wasn’t a lack of tax revenue — it was about “how the money is being spent.”

David Sacks


White House crypto czar David Sacks is pictured.

David Sacks analogized California’s tax increases to a frog in boiling water.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The White House AI and crypto czar took aim at California’s government in an X post on Sunday.

Red states like Texas and Florida don’t employ state income taxes, let alone wealth taxes, Sacks wrote. “Democrats steal everything, then blame job creators for their ‘greed,'” he wrote.

Sacks said in an October episode of the “All-In” podcast, which he cohosts, that a wealth tax “always backfires,” because tax benefits are outweighed by wealthy residents leaving.

Sacks threatened to leave the state, analogizing steady tax increases to boiling a frog on the podcast.

“I’m going to have to jump out of the pot with this,” he said.

Ro Khanna


Representative Ro Khanna is pictured.

Ro Khanna said Nvidia would be built all over again in California, even with the wealth tax.

Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

The Congressman for California’s 17th district, which covers much of Silicon Valley, said that the proposal was “good for American innovation.”

After receiving thousands of comments on a Friday post bidding a sarcastic goodbye to those threatening to leave the state, Khanna explained his support in a seven-paragraph X post on Saturday.

He wrote that Nvidia would be built all over again, even with the wealth tax.

“Jensen [Huang] wasn’t thinking I won’t start this company because I may have to one day pay a 1% tax on my billions,” Khanna wrote. “He built here because the talent is here.”

Khanna argued that innovation would be further stifled by the “political dysfunction and social unrest” that comes with wide wealth gaps.

In a statement to Business Insider, Sarah Drory, a spokesperson for Rep. Khanna, wrote that the representative has “always supported a modest wealth tax on billionaires to deal with staggering inequality and to make sure people have healthcare.”

“He has advocated for common sense workarounds for startup founders whose companies are not profitable and who have illiquid stock,” Drory wrote.

Palmer Luckey


Palmer Luckey is pictured.

Palmer Luckey wrote that the wealth tax would force startups to pivot to profit.

PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images

The Oculus founder and Anduril cofounder wrote in a Sunday X post that the tax would force founders to “sell huge chunks of our companies.”

Luckey wrote that he made money from Oculus — which he sold to Facebook in 2014 — and paid millions in taxes on it. Then he used the “remainder” to start Anduril, he wrote.

“Now me and my cofounders have to somehow come up with billions of dollars in cash,” Luckey wrote.

Luckey also wrote that the policy made no provision for companies that funnel revenue back to research and development, rather than paying cash incomes sizable enough to cover the tax.

“You are effectively forcing companies to immediately pivot into profit obsession over mission or long-term sustainability,” he wrote.

Garry Tan


Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan is pictured.

Garry Tan wrote that the wealth tax would “kill little tech in California.”

Seb Daly/Web Summit via Getty Images

The CEO of startup accelerator Y Combinator wrote in a Saturday X post that the tax would “kill little tech in California.”

Unicorn startup founders become a “paper billionaire” — as in, having cash on hand — around the $5 billion valuation point, Tan wrote.

The proposed tax is on unrealized gains, meaning founders would be put on the line even before their wealth is liquid, Tan wrote.

If the tax passed, Tan wrote that Y Combinator would consider opening Austin or Cambridge programs.

Bernie Sanders


Senator Bernie Sanders is pictured.

Bernie Sanders wrote in support of wealth taxes on X.

Heather Diehl/Getty Images

The Vermont senator has long been a proponent of taxes on the wealthy, introducing a bill in 2019 that aimed to halve the wealth of billionaires over a 15-year period.

While Sanders didn’t explicitly comment on the California proposal, he posted Monday on X broadly supporting wealth taxes.

“We can respect innovation & entrepreneurship, but we cannot respect the extraordinary greed that now exists,” Sanders wrote. “We need a wealth tax.”

Elon Musk


Elon Musk at the US-Saudi Investment Forum at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, DC, on November 19, 2025.

Elon Musk wrote that he was a “maker,” not a “taker.”

BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images

The Tesla CEO reposted another user’s X post that commented on the tax, saying that his stocks weren’t wealth.

Musk wrote in his Tuesday post that his “wealth” was mostly tied up in Tesla and SpaceX shares.

“This means my ‘wealth’ can only increase due to producing more products and services for the public,” he wrote.

While not directly commenting on the California tax, Musk wrote that he was a “maker,” unlike “taker” politicians like Sanders.

Musk said in 2020 that he had moved from California to Texas.

Gavin Newsom


California governor Gavin Newsom is pictured.

Gavin Newsom said that California had to stay competitive with other states.

David Dee Delgado/Getty Images for The New York Times

The governor of California has spoken against the wealth tax. At The New York Times’ Dealbook conference in December, Newsom said that California had to stay competitive with other states.

“People of that status, they already have two or three homes outside the state,” he said. “You’ve got to be pragmatic about it.”

If the tax passes as a ballot measure, Newsom would not have the ability to veto it.




Source link

I-spent-a-year-interviewing-and-listening-to-over-50.jpeg

I spent a year interviewing and listening to over 50 tech leaders talk about AI. Here are the 4 biggest lessons.

I’ve listened to and interviewed more than 50 tech leaders this year, from executives running trillion-dollar firms to young founders betting their futures on AI.

Across boardrooms, conferences, and podcast interviews, the people building our AI future kept returning to the same four themes:

1. Use AI, because someone who understands AI better might replace you

This is the line I heard most often. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has said it multiple times this year.

“Every job will be affected, and immediately. It is unquestionable. You’re not going to lose your job to an AI, but you’re going to lose your job to someone who uses AI,” he said at the Milken Institute’s Global Conference in May.

Other tech leaders echoed his view, with some saying that younger workers may actually have an edge because they are already comfortable using AI tools.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said on Cleo Abram’s “Huge Conversations” YouTube show in August that while AI will inevitably wipe out some roles, college graduates are better equipped to adjust.

“If I were 22 right now and graduating college, I would feel like the luckiest kid in all of history,” Altman said, adding that his bigger concern is how older workers will cope as AI reshapes work.

Fei-Fei Li, the Stanford professor known as the “godmother of AI,” said in an interview on “The Tim Ferriss Show” published earlier this month that resistance to AI is a dealbreaker. She said she won’t hire engineers who refuse to use AI tools at her startup, World Labs.

This shift is already showing up in everyday roles. An accountant and an HR professional told me they’re using AI tools, including vibe coding, to level up their skills and stay relevant.

2. Soft skills matter more in the AI era

Another consensus I’ve heard among tech leaders is that AI makes soft skills more valuable.

Salesforce’s chief futures officer, Peter Schwartz, told me in an interview in May that “the most important skill is empathy, working with other people,” not coding knowledge.

“Parents ask me what should my kids study, shall they be coders? I said, ‘Learn how to work with others,'” he said.


salesforce peter schwartz

I interviewed Salesforce’s chief futures officer, Peter Schwartz, in May.

Lee Chong Ming/Business Insider



LinkedIn’s head economist for Asia Pacific, Chua Pei Ying, also told me in July that she sees soft skills like communication and collaboration becoming increasingly important for experienced workers and fresh graduates.

As AI automates parts of our job and makes teams leaner, the human part of the job is starting to matter more.

3. AI is evolving fast — and superintelligence is coming

As the year went on, the stakes around AI’s future began to feel bigger and more real. Tech leaders increasingly spoke about chasing artificial general intelligence, or AGI, and eventually superintelligence.

AGI refers to AI systems that can match human intelligence across a range of tasks, while superintelligence describes systems that surpass human capabilities.

Altman said in September that society needs to be prepared for superintelligence, which could arrive by 2030. Mark Zuckerberg established Meta’s Superintelligence Labs in June and said that the company is pushing toward superintelligence.

These leaders don’t want to miss the AI moment. Zuckerberg underscored that urgency in September, saying he would rather risk “misspending a couple of hundred billion dollars” than be late to superintelligence.

Some tech leaders, such as Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi, argued that the industry has already achieved AGI. Others are more cautious. Google DeepMind’s cofounder, Demis Hassabis, said in April that AGI could arrive “in the next five to 10 years.”

Even when tech leaders disagree on timelines, they tend to agree on one thing: AI progress is compounding.

I saw this acceleration from the outside as a user. New tools are rolling out at a dizzying pace — from ChatGPT adding shopping features and image generation to China’s “AGI cameras.”

Things that would have felt magical in January now feel normal.


LingGuang

I tried Ant Group’s vibe coding app LingGuang’s AGI camera last month.

Lee Chong Ming/LingGuang



4. The human needs to be at the center of AI

Many leaders also circled back to the need for human control amid AI acceleration.

Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman said superintelligence must support human agency, not override it. He said on an episode of the “Silicon Valley Girl Podcast” published in November that his team is “trying to build a humanist superintelligence,” warning that systems smarter than humans will be difficult to contain or align with human interests.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has been blunt about the risks AI poses if it’s misused.

While advanced AI can lower the barrier to knowledge work, the risks scale alongside the rewards, Amodei said on an episode of the New York Times’ “Hard Fork” published in February.

“If you look at our responsible scaling policy, it’s nothing but AI, autonomy, and CBRN — chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear,” Amodei said.

“It is about hardcore misuse in AI autonomy that could be threats to the lives of millions of people,” he added.

Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the “godfather of AI,” said in August that as AI systems surpass human intelligence, safeguarding humanity becomes the central challenge.

“We have to make it so that when they’re more powerful than us and smarter than us, they still care about us,” Hinton said at the Ai4 conference in Las Vegas.




Source link