Some-ships-are-sailing-through-the-Strait-of-Hormuz-Others.jpeg

Some ships are sailing through the Strait of Hormuz. Others are turning around. Here’s what ‘completely open’ looks like for now.

Iran announced Friday morning that the Strait of Hormuz is open for maritime traffic, and mid-afternoon data showed that commercial vessels were passing through the strategic waterway, though only a small number.

Friday evening, a large group of vessels sailed toward the strait but inexplicably turned away, ship-tracking data shows, raising questions about the status of this critical chokepoint.

Opening the strait has been a central demand since the start of a fragile ceasefire earlier this month and amid the ongoing negotiations between Washington and Tehran.

Seyed Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, said in a statement on social media Friday that “the passage for all commercial vessels through Strait of Hormuz is declared completely open for the remaining period of ceasefire, on the coordinated route as already announced by Ports and Maritime Organization of the Islamic Rep. of Iran.” The announcement follows a ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon.

Iran’s coordinated route appears to refer to previously released guidance that takes ships through the northern part of the waterway closest to Iran, which has said that the route was determined by security needs. Separate from Iranian considerations, US forces have been working to establish safe passage in the strait, where mines continue to represent a potential threat.

Shipping organizations have had mixed reactions. Some welcomed the news as a positive signal, while others urged caution. It is unclear how much has changed with Friday’s announcement from Iran.

President Donald Trump acknowledged Iran’s Friday statement in a Truth Social post, writing that “Iran has just announced that the Strait of Iran is fully open and ready for passage.” The market reaction to the announcement saw stocks climb higher and oil fall.

The strategic Strait of Hormuz is a narrow chokepoint linking the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and a major artery for global shipments of oil and natural gas.

MarineTraffic data from Friday afternoon showed that just over half a dozen commercial vessels had transited the strait since the announcement.

Data from KPler, a real-time trade intelligence platform, showed that eight commercial vessels had crossed as of 2 pm EST Friday compared to five on Thursday. The data refers to commercial fleets of crude tankers, LPG, LNG, and dry bulk vessels. Containerships are not included in the count. But by the evening, new data showed ships were turning back.

The limited number of ships that have gone through is a fraction of the pre-war normal. Before the war, the strait saw an average of over 120 transits daily.

Earlier in the week, days before the announcement on the strait, US Navy warships set up a blockade of Iranian ships and ports. Trump said the blockade will remain in effect until Washington and Tehran reach a deal to end the war.

US Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has highlighted the role of the Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class destroyers in the blockade during a briefing Thursday but didn’t specify numbers involved.

Dozens of surveillance aircraft, refueling planes, and drones are also involved in the blockade. US Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East, said Friday that 19 vessels have turned around to comply with blockade restrictions since it began on Monday.

The US set up the blockade amid a tenuous ceasefire between the US and Iran, which was reached after more than a month of war. US military leaders have asserted that American forces remain poised to resume combat operations should the negotiations fail.


Source link

I-let-my-kids-swear-at-home-It-has-improved.jpeg

I let my kids swear at home. It has improved our communication, and they are more open with me.

In our house, curse words aren’t taboo.

There’s no punishment if someone mutters a frustrated word after dropping something or losing a game. At first glance, that might sound like an unusual parenting choice, maybe even a permissive one.

The truth is, letting go of this particular rule has made our home calmer and our conversations more honest.

Not every battle is worth fighting

I’m a mom of three — ages 6, 12, and 15 — and like most parents, I’ve had to learn that not every battle is worth fighting. Parenting often comes with a long list of things we’re supposed to correct: language, behavior, tone, attitude. For a long time, I reacted the way many parents do when I heard a curse word. I corrected it immediately and reminded my kids that those words weren’t allowed.


family posing for photo

The author’s kids started opening up to her more. 

Courtesy of the author



Over time, I started noticing something. Most of the time, my kids weren’t being disrespectful. They weren’t swearing at anyone. They were frustrated, embarrassed, or overwhelmed. A glass would break, a homework problem wouldn’t make sense, or a game wouldn’t go their way. The word they used was simply the fastest way to express how they were feeling.

And suddenly we weren’t talking about the thing that upset them anymore. We were arguing about the word they chose to express it.

I was spending too much time policing language

Eventually, I realized I was spending more energy policing language than actually helping my kids navigate their emotions. At the same time, life already felt full. Parenting, work, schedules, responsibilities — it often felt like I was carrying a basket full of eggs. Every small rule, every correction, every argument was another egg I was trying to balance.

At some point, I had to admit that the basket was already full. If I kept adding more, something important would break.


Woman posing for photo

The author has rules around cursing for her kids. 

Courtesy of the author



So I started letting a few things go — including the rule about curse words — so I could focus on what actually mattered most: making sure my kids feel seen, heard, and understood when they’re struggling.

Some rules protect what matters. Others just add weight to the basket.

We treat cursing as emotional expression, not misbehavior

Over time, it became clear that the words themselves weren’t the real problem. The emotion behind them was what actually mattered.

Kids experience frustration the same way adults do. The difference is that they’re still learning how to manage it. Sometimes that learning process includes imperfect language.

Instead of treating every curse word as misbehavior, I started thinking of it as an emotional expression. If my child mutters a word under their breath after dropping something heavy or getting stuck on homework, it’s usually just a quick way of releasing frustration.

By shifting my perspective, those moments stopped feeling like something that needed discipline and started feeling like something that needed understanding.

We set flexible boundaries instead of banning words

Letting go of the “no swearing ever” rule didn’t mean anything goes. We still have clear expectations about when and where certain language is appropriate.

In our house, the boundaries are simple: don’t swear at school, don’t swear at people, don’t swear around your grandparents, and ideally don’t swear around me.

Those boundaries have been enough.

Swearing at someone crosses the line into disrespect, and we address it immediately. School has its own rules, and we expect our kids to follow them. And around grandparents, we simply try to keep things respectful.

But if a frustrated word slips out when something goes wrong, I don’t turn it into a bigger issue. We move on. In our home, the focus is on how we treat people, not whether every sentence is perfectly clean.

Dropping this battle removed a surprising amount of tension

What surprised me most about this shift is how quickly the tension around language disappeared.

When every small slip used to trigger a correction, it created a steady stream of tiny conflicts. Parenting already involves enough reminders and redirections. Adding language policing to that list just created another opportunity for disagreement.

Once I stopped reacting so strongly, those moments mostly faded away. The kids weren’t getting much of a reaction anymore, so the words stopped feeling rebellious or dramatic. They simply became what they were in the first place: quick expressions of frustration.

Our house felt calmer almost immediately. Conversations didn’t escalate as easily, and small moments that used to turn into arguments began to pass without much attention.

The biggest benefit has been more honest communication

One unexpected benefit of relaxing this rule is that my kids talk more openly.

Kids don’t always have the vocabulary to explain exactly what they’re feeling, especially when emotions are running high. If they feel like every sentence is going to be corrected, sometimes they stop talking altogether.

By lowering the pressure around language, my kids are more likely to say what they’re actually feeling. Sometimes it’s blunt. Sometimes it’s messy. But it’s honest. And honest conversations are much easier to work through than silent ones.

Instead of getting stuck correcting a word choice, we can focus on the bigger conversation: what upset them, what went wrong, and how they might handle it next time.

Letting go of this rule made me a calmer parent

Parenting has taught me that some rules deserve more energy than others.

Safety matters. Respect matters. Responsibility matters. Those are the things we focus on consistently in our home.

Language, on the other hand, turned out to be more flexible than I once believed.

By deciding that curse words weren’t the hill I wanted to die on, I removed one small but constant source of tension from our home. I also found myself reacting less and listening more.

And in the end, that shift didn’t just change how my kids communicate. It changed how I show up as a parent.

Our house isn’t perfect. No house with three kids ever is. But it’s calmer than it used to be.

And sometimes that kind of change starts with something as simple as deciding one rule just isn’t worth the fight.




Source link

Julia Pugachevsky's face on a gray background.

More people want open relationships, but here’s why many don’t last

Open relationships have gotten a cultural glow-up among younger adults. In practice, though, they’re hard to pull off.

There’s a lot of social media chatter where people in happy non-monogamous relationships report perks such as greater sexual satisfaction, multiple deep partnerships, and less restrictive love lives.

Still, outside the tweets, threads, and curated Instagram grids, the story is a bit more nuanced. A 2023 Pew Research report found that Americans are divided on open marriages. Of about 5,000 US adults surveyed, 37% found open marriages completely unacceptable. Younger generations approved more than anyone else: roughly half of 18- to 29-year-olds were accepting of open marriages.

Dr. Justin R. Garcia, the executive director of the Kinsey Institute, has also witnessed the growing popularity of non-monogamy in his work.

“People were talking about swinging in the 60s and 70s, but the language and the amount of attention to it changed, particularly over the last decade,” Garcia told Business Insider, citing Amy C. Moors, a sexuality scientist who noticed a steady increase in people searching for terms related to polyamory between 2006 and 2015.

However, showing interest and actually engaging in the activity are two different things. In his new book, “The Intimate Animal,” Garcia said that research from his lab at the Kinsey Institute, one of the most prominent research centers for human sexuality and relationships, found that one in five single adults in the US, out of about 8,700 studied, have had some kind of consensual, non-monogamous relationship at some point in their lives.


Hands holding

Studies suggest that more people have tried non-monogamy than have maintained it long-term.

Vershinin/Getty Images



When looking at the past five years in another study of Garcia’s, however, that number dropped significantly, suggesting that “more people try it than decide that it is a lifelong relationship structure for them,” Garcia said. “In my social networks, that’s been my experience as well.”

It doesn’t mean that they never work, he added. According to multiple studies, “while consensually open relationships might not work for everyone, or even for most people, there are many people for whom they do work perfectly well,” he wrote in his book. Those in happy non-monogamous relationships, for example, don’t fare psychologically or emotionally worse than content monogamous couples.

“In terms of who’s a good candidate for it? My cheeky answer, but it’s actually true, is those people who really want to do it,” Garcia said. “It’s similar to ‘What’s the right amount of sex that we should be having?’ It’s as much as you want.”

Still, that doesn’t mean open relationships work for everyone. Based on his research, Garcia shared the most common reasons non-monogamous partnerships don’t work out.

It takes work to balance partners


Three people hugging

Devoting enough time to your partners can be challenging.

FG Trade/Getty Images



One of the most common challenges to non-monogamous partnerships might be our own biology.

“We have such a fundamental, evolved drive to form intense pair bonds,” Garcia said, ones that biologists theorize helped us thrive as a species over time. In his book, he said that “our brains don’t appear particularly well-suited to processing intimacy with more than one partner at a time,” be it another romantic partner or a sexual fling. Even fantasies of threesomes, Garcia said, more often involve an existing partner.

If romance is most often defined by sustained attention and effort, then it becomes more difficult when one or both partners have other people to focus on. Introducing a new partner into a shared home can cause friction with a spouse, as can skipping dinner with a spouse to spend it with another significant other.

Garcia said one of the “prevailing rationales” for consensual non-monogamy is having “too much love to give.” However, he wrote, the opposite is true: “Most people don’t have the biological, psychological, and social tools to love more than one person at a time.”

Extra communication can be a turn-off


Couple holding hands

Healthy non-monogamous relationships require extra communication, which some people find off-putting.

Tom Werner/Getty Images



In his research, Garcia said the happiest non-monogamous couples have the same thing in common: “They tend to engage in a lot of communication.”

One 20-person polycule, for instance, uses a software engineer strategy called “agile scrum” to resolve any relationship issues. It involves monthly reviews, discussion questions, and action points.

“Even casual polyamorous encounters take substantial effort and negotiation,” Garcia wrote, including lots of communication. “Who needs more touch? Less? Who is feeling neglected? Who needs more time with whom? What is the state of things between each member of the polycule and each of the others?”

Some people find that level of frequent, in-depth communication builds their intimacy and brings them closer. Still, for many people, it’s just too much work.

It can magnify issues instead of fixing them


Couple hugging

Non-monogamy can heighten existing issues like jealousy and mismatched libidos.

gorodenkoff/Getty Images



In any healthy relationship, Garcia said there’s a basic framework you have to follow: “There’s me, there’s you, and there’s us.” What might make one person happier, like having more romantic partners, might make the other feel neglected.

For a non-monogamous relationship to work, “you want to be able to both navigate your feelings of jealousy,” Garcia said. Furthermore, he added, it helps if you actively enjoy knowing that your partner is with others.

The last reason you should be in a polyamorous or open relationship is because you want it to “fix” your current relationship. Often, he wrote, “the same issues that plague monogamous relationships — mismatched libidos, jealousy, boredom, and more — tend to surface in consensually non-monogamous ones.” In fact, he added, they can multiply when partners aren’t communicating or devoting enough time to each other.

“As one of my friends who had attempted to form a polycule once told me, ‘It didn’t work,'” Garcia wrote. “‘I just pissed off two women instead of one.'”




Source link