Headshot photo of Laura Italiano

Alexander brothers found guilty on all counts. Wealthy siblings face potential life terms for a decade of rapes.

A trio of wealthy brothers was found guilty of federal sex-trafficking charges in Manhattan on Monday in a grand-slam verdict convicting them of each count they faced in a 10-count indictment.

The jury deliberated for three days before announcing a verdict for former luxury real estate brokers Tal Alexander, 39, and Oren Alexander, 38, as well as for Oren’s twin, Alon Alexander, a former executive in his parents’ private security firm.

The three brothers sat at the defense tables, shaking their heads as the verdict was read. Sentencing was set for August 6 for each defendant.

Any sex trafficking conviction, including for the top count of sex-trafficking conspiracy, carries a potential maximum sentence of life in prison.

The verdict follows a five-week trial in which prosecutors called 10 rape accusers to testify, none of whom had reported their incidents to police.

The women gave compelling, sometimes tearful testimony about attacks in luxe locations in Manhattan, the Hamptons, Aspen, and Tel Aviv stretching back to 2008, when the brothers were in their early 20s.

They said the brothers used false promises of “afterparties” or fun weekend getaways to lure them into the worst experiences of their lives — being sexually violated through violence or a drugged drink.

Two women told jurors that they were drugged and then attacked by two of the brothers at the same time.

One said the twins took turns raping her inside a cruise ship cabin in 2012. The other said she was attacked by Tal and Alon Alexander and two other men in the bedroom of a Southampton vacation home in 2009, when she was 16 years old.

“I was wondering why they hated me,” the woman recalled thinking as she fell in and out of consciousness on a bed.

All ten women told jurors that in the hours and days after they were attacked, shame and fear kept them from telling anyone but their closest friends.

Only when they saw that the brothers were being sued and arrested — over allegations like their own — did they find the courage to step forward, the women testified.

“Because this feels bigger than me,” one accuser explained of coming forward now, fourteen years after she said she was drugged and raped at age 20 after a party at the Manhattan penthouse of actor Zac Efron.

“I’m 34 years old now, and I know who I am,” another accuser explained of coming forward. “And I wanted someone to be held accountable for what happened to me.”

Defense lawyers maintained that any sex was consensual and that the accusations were the product of regret and faulty memories.

They pointed to inconsistencies about timing and the women’s failure to take drug tests or report the incidents to law enforcement, and noted that many of the women communicated with the brothers

The defense also challenged whether the accounts the women described added up to sex trafficking, the charge behind half the counts in the ten-count indictment.

To convict on sex trafficking, jurors needed to find that the brothers used force, fraud, or coercion — including by secretly drugging drinks — to cause a commercial sex act, defined as sex in return for something of value.

Prosecutors said that the “something of value” was the brothers’ promise of a beach weekend at a Hamptons mansion, or an invite to go from a club to a hotel room for a fun “after-party.”

Defense lawyers countered that what was described in testimony was not sex trafficking because, in their view, there was no quid-pro-quo relationship proven between the lure — the “something of value” — and the alleged sex.

“The commerce — the thing of value — must be a result of the sex,” argued Marc Agnifilo, defense attorney for Oren Alexander.

In July, Agnifilo won a partial acquittal in another high-profile Manhattan sex trafficking case, that of entertainment and lifestyle entrepreneur Sean “Diddy” Combs.

In that trial, Agnifilo similarly argued that the federal sex-trafficking statute was being stretched beyond its original purpose of protecting sex workers.

Combs was also acquitted of racketeering; he was convicted of transporting for purposes of prostitution and is serving a four-year prison term.




Source link

Anthropic-says-it-cant-in-good-conscience-agree-to-the.jpeg

Anthropic says it can’t ‘in good conscience’ agree to the military’s terms over the use of its AI

Anthropic’s CEO is prepared to walk away from its contract with the military, according to a new statement published on Thursday.

In a blog post, CEO Dario Amodei said that the company “cannot in good conscience accede” to the request of the Defense Department concerning safeguards around its frontier model, Claude.

On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic an ultimatum to agree with the military’s terms over the use of Claude or get blacklisted by the government.

Defense officials gave Anthropic until Friday evening to agree to the terms.

The terms were not clarified, but the issue, according to Amodei’s statement, appears to revolve around two red lines Anthropic is not willing to cross when it comes to how Claude is deployed: mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons.

A spokesperson for Anthropic declined to comment.

Hours before Amodei put out a statement, Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesperson, posted on X that the department had no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of US citizens or to develop autonomous weapons.

And several hours after Amodei released his statement, the Department’s undersecretary for research and engineering, Emil Michael, lashed out at the CEO in a social media post.

“It’s a shame that @DarioAmodei is a liar and has a God-complex. He wants nothing more than to try to personally control the US Military and is ok putting our nation’s safety at risk,” Michael wrote on X.

“The @DeptofWar will ALWAYS adhere to the law but not bend to whims of any one for-profit tech company,” added Michael, who was previously Uber’s chief business officer.

A person familiar with the negotiations told Business Insider the department provided a new proposal just 36 hours before Hegseth’s deadline, and the language around the provisions on mass surveillance and autonomous weapons allowed for “any lawful use” of Anthropic’s AI.

The person said that the additions essentially gave the military to discretion to set aside Anthropic’s red lines and use Claude as it sees fit.

A senior Pentagon official told Business Insider on Tuesday that the department will consider invoking the Defense Production Act — a wartime law that would essentially give the president control over Anthropic’s resources in the interest of national security — and deem the company a supply chain risk.

Both uses of the national authorities would be unprecedented, experts told Business Insider, considering that the levers are being used as a negotiating tactic and against an American company.

“I’m not aware of this ever having been used as a weapon in a negotiating posture,” Dean Ball, an ex-senior policy advisor for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told Business Insider.

Amodei wrote in his blog post that the two threats are “inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security.”

The CEO wrote that Anthropic hopes the government will “reconsider” its position on the safeguards and that the company’s preference is to continue working with the military.

“Should the Department choose to offboard Anthropic, we will work to enable a smooth transition to another provider, avoiding any disruption to ongoing military planning, operations, or other critical missions,” Amodei wrote.

It’s not yet clear how the Pentagon plans to respond.

February 27, 2026: This story was updated to reflect a public statement by Emil Michael, the Pentagon’s undersecretary for research and engineering, about Amodei.




Source link