Im-an-American-who-studied-at-universities-in-China-The.jpeg

I’m an American who studied at universities in China. The Chinese system was cheaper and set me up for success after graduation.

I’ve done something quite rare: I’m an American who attended college in both the US and China.

I completed my undergraduate degree in political science at a state university in New York and studied abroad in Wuhan, China, during the summer of 2015. Ten years later, in 2025, I returned to Shijiazhuang, China, while completing my second graduate degree in global health, interning at a medical university.

Experiencing Chinese universities at two distinct points in my life, a decade apart, gave me a rare view of how the system operates and how it has evolved.

I didn’t meet any Americans studying in China most recently

During my first trip, I was in a group of about 30 American college students. The second time, I was the only person from my cohort to go.

Since the pandemic, the number of US students in China has dropped, according to NPR. In fact, I didn’t meet a single American in the three months I was in the country most recently.

Both times, I met lots of African students, though. They were heavily invested in and integrated into the Chinese learning and working systems.

I’ve noticed China sets the international students I met up for success

Many of the international students I talked to in the US told me how hard it was to integrate and find a pathway to work after school in New York.

In China, I noticed there’s a pathway for international students who want to stay, particularly those who have developed strong Mandarin skills.

The Chinese government and universities are actively trying to entice international students to come to the country, while also investing in ways to retain graduates.

Campus life looks very different from what I experienced in the US

The internet firewall in China can make research difficult, and I’ve seen doctors smoking in classrooms between lectures.

Student life also reflects a different set of norms. There is low tolerance for drugs and alcohol on many Chinese campuses. After class, I saw friends playing badminton rather than drinking beer.

Technology and security are also visible on campus. Students on the campuses I studied entered by scanning their faces and were tracked by cameras.


catherine work surronded by students in China

The author worked with many Chinese students.

Courtesy of Catherine Work



Politics also felt more openly present in academic life. Most of the professors and physicians I worked with were active members of the Communist Party and often wore pins on their lapels to signify it.

As one local friend put it, “having one state party means policies don’t change every four years,” which, in their view, can create a certain level of stability for universities.

Chinese universities are far cheaper and more specialized

The two universities I studied at in China didn’t have the fancy sports facilities most American colleges do, but many students I met weren’t going into debt to study either.

Tuition in China is subsidized by the government, especially at public universities. That means it’s relatively affordable compared with many Western countries.

Housing and food costs are also inexpensive in my experience. I was eating a healthy lunch on campus for $1 a day. My American campus used to sell a single banana for $1.05 in 2015.

I also spent a year taking general courses in America. While I loved taking a class on Bollywood as a political science major, the specialization offered by many Chinese universities helped better prepare me for the real world. I also saved money by not taking general courses while in China.

Studying in both systems changed how I think about education

I didn’t just earn my degrees in multiple countries; I learned about the culture of education. I learned how the government impacts who can study what and if they will be successful.

I’ll always be partial to the American scholastic mentality of questioning everything and forming opinions, rather than the rote memorization I saw in China, but I’d prefer not to be launched into the working world with so much student loan debt.

I hope more Americans can form their own opinions of China’s educational system, which has rapidly evolved and will only continue to grow in its unique way.




Source link

Kelsey Baker, Military and Defense Reporting Fellow

It’s not just Harvard. The Pentagon is barring troops from attending more Ivy League schools and other top universities.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Friday that the Pentagon is formally cutting ties with Ivy League schools and other top universities, barring all active-duty troops seeking graduate-level education from attending specific institutions.

Military attendance at select schools will be canceled starting this coming academic year, Hegseth said in an X post, accusing schools of indoctrinating service members with an unexplained “woke” ideology.

It is not clear how this change will affect active-duty students already in the middle of multi-year programs.

The military’s professional military education system has “been poisoned from within by a class of so-called elite universities who’ve abused their privilege and access,” Hegesth said, and have instead become “factories of anti-American resentment and military disdain.”

Elite schools, such as Princeton, Yale, Columbia, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have “taken our best and brightest, the men and women who pledged their lives to this nation, and subjected them to a curriculum of contempt,” the secretary said. “They’ve replaced the study of victory and pragmatic realism with the promotion of wokeness and weakness. They’ve traded true intellectual rigor for radical dogma, sacrificed. Seek free expression for the suffocating confines of leftist ideology.”

The Pentagon did not respond to Business Insider’s request for specific details on Hegseth’s allegations. BI also requested a full list of schools affected by the Friday announcement, which was not provided.


US service members fly above the Pentagon in northern Virginia.

The Pentagon is scrutinizing its partnerships with institutions of higher learning.

DoD photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Alexander Kubitza



If a senior officer selected for graduate school is already a top performer, it’s unrealistic to think a one- or two-year program would fundamentally change them, said Dan Maurer, a retired Army lieutenant colonel and associate law professor at Ohio Northern University who called the thought of such a sudden personal philosophical change “far-fetched.”

He also said it’s valuable to have troops and civilians exposed to one another, as it helps bridge the ever-widening gap between American civilians and their military.

Hegseth made the announcement on X on Friday afternoon, just hours after using the platform to announce that the military’s relationship with Scouting America (formerly Boy Scouts) will hinge on the nonprofit’s acceptance of Pentagon requests to change the program, including halting DEI efforts and barring transgender youth from openly participating in Scouts.

These universities teach service members “to despise the very nation they swore to defend,” and enforce a “creed of globalist submission,” he said in the most recent announcement.

A list of 33 schools undergoing DoD review emerged online last week after an Army JAG notified active-duty troops and prospective students that certain schools may no longer be available to them and advised troops to “have a backup plan.”

That leaked guidance noted that Harvard was “fully off limits,” a reflection of the Pentagon’s previous decision to sever ties with Harvard University. Hegseth, who has a master’s degree from Harvard, accused it of being “one of the red-hot centers of Hate America activism.” Other schools were marked as risks.

One prospective student on active duty who hopes to attend one of the schools previously marked for review by the Pentagon told Business Insider the latest announcement from Hegseth has deflated them and may contribute to their decision to leave the military early. They spoke on the condition of anonymity due to concerns about professional repercussions.

A new review is forthcoming for “senior service” schools and internal war colleges, the secretary said, “ensuring they are once again bastions of strategic thought wholly dedicated to the singular mission of developing the most lethal and effective leaders and war fighters the world has ever known.”

He did not specify which institutions the review could include, though schools like the National Defense University and each service’s war college could be targeted.




Source link